Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 12;58(34):15246-15256.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c05808. Online ahead of print.

Biodegradation of Water-Soluble Polymers by Wastewater Microorganisms: Challenging Laboratory Testing Protocols

Affiliations

Biodegradation of Water-Soluble Polymers by Wastewater Microorganisms: Challenging Laboratory Testing Protocols

Aaron Kintzi et al. Environ Sci Technol. .

Abstract

For water-soluble polymers (WSPs) that enter environmental systems at their end-of-life, biodegradability is a key functionality. For the development and regulation of biodegradable WSPs, testing methods that are both scientifically validated and economically practicable are needed. Here, we used respirometric laboratory tests to study the biodegradation of poly(amino acids), poly(ethylene glycol), and poly(vinyl alcohol), together with appropriate low-molecular-weight reference substrates. We varied key protocol steps of commonly used testing methods, which were originally established for small molecules and tested for effects on WSP biodegradation. We found that avoiding aeration of the wastewater inoculate prior to WSP addition, incubating WSP with filter-sterilized wastewater prior to biodegradation testing, and lowering the WSP concentration can increase biodegradation rates of WSPs. Combining the above-mentioned protocol variations substantially affected the results of the biodegradation testing for the two poly(amino acids) tested herein (i.e., poly(lysine) and poly(aspartic acid)). Our findings were consistent between microbial inocula derived from two municipal wastewater treatment plants. Our study presents promising biodegradation dynamics for poly(amino acids) and highlights the importance, strengths, and limitations of respirometric laboratory methods for WSP biodegradation testing.

Keywords: Water-soluble polymers; biodegradation testing; biological wastewater treatment; environmentally benign-by-design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): S.D. and G.B. work at BASF SE, a company producing and marketing polymers. A.K. and M.Z. declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biodegradation of WSPs by microorganisms derived from two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). (A) Biodegradation curves calculated based on theoretical O2 demand (ThOD) and measured O2 consumption during WSP incubation using the OxiTop system. Arrows indicate extended experiments (complete data in Figure S3). Asterisks (*) indicate stopped incubations due to instrument malfunctioning. (B) and (C) Times to reach 10% and 50% biodegradation, respectively. (D) Biodegradation extents after 28 days of incubation. Error bars represent, where not stated with an asterisk (*), standard deviations of triplicates and ranges of duplicates for WWTP2 and WWTP1, respectively. Gluc: glucose, PEG: poly(ethylene glycol), PVA: poly(vinyl alcohol), Lys: lysine, PLL: ε-poly(l-lysine), Asp: aspartic acid, PAsA: poly(aspartic acid).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Effect of inoculum washing and aeration (6 days) on WSP biodegradation. Times to reach 10% biodegradation were calculated based on theoretical CO2 production (ThCO2) using the BSBdigi-CO2 system for wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) 1 inocula and based on theoretical O2 demand (ThOD) using the OxiTop system for WWTP2 inocula. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate (WWTP2) and ranges of duplicates (WWTP1). Daggers (†) indicate incubations were lag phases were derived from linear interpolation due to data gaps caused by software malfunction (Figure S13). For WWTP1/PEG/6d aerated, a range is given that was visually determined (Figure S14). (B) Effect of Preincubation with filter-sterilized influent wastewater (iWW) on WSP biodegradation. Times to reach 10% biodegradation were calculated based on ThOD and measured O2 consumption using the OxiTop system for WWTP1 and 2. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates where not indicated differently (*, n = 2). Gluc: glucose, PEG: poly(ethylene glycol), PVA: poly(vinyl alcohol), Lys: lysine, PLL: ε-poly(l-lysine), Asp: aspartic acid, PAsA: poly(aspartic acid).
Figure 3
Figure 3
WSP biodegradation at different concentrations and after pre-exposure. (A) Times to reach 10% biodegradation were calculated based on theoretical O2 demand (ThOD) and measured O2 consumption using the OxiTop system. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates or ranges of duplicates, where indicated with an asterisk (*). (B) Biodegradation curves of blank-corrected biological oxygen demand (BOD) for wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) 1 and 2. Red vertical lines mark the time points, at which test substrate was added a second time (i.e., respike). Gluc: glucose, PEG: poly(ethylene glycol), PVA: poly(vinyl alcohol), PLL: ε-poly(l-lysine), PAsA: poly(aspartic acid).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Combined effect of inoculum aeration, preincubation with filter-sterilized wastewater, and WSP concentration on WSP biodegradation. (A) Biodegradation curves calculated based on theoretical O2 demand (ThOD) and measured O2 consumption using the OxiTop system for wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) 1 and 2 inocula. (B) Times to reach 10% biodegradation. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates, where not indicated differently (n = #, indicated above each bar). Gluc: glucose; Lys: lysine; PLL: ε-poly(l-lysine); Asp: aspartic acid; PAsA: poly(aspartic acid).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vandermeulen G. W.; Boarino A.; Klok H.-A. Biodegradation of Water-soluble and Water-dispersible Polymers for Agricultural, Consumer, and Industrial Applications—Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Materials Solutions. J. Polym. Sci. 2022, 60, 1797.10.1002/pol.20210922. - DOI
    1. Polymers in Liquid Formulations Technical Report: A Landscape View of the Global PLFs Market. Royal Society of Chemistry.https://www.rsc.org/globalassets/22-new-perspectives/sustainability/liqu... (accessed 2024-02-01).
    1. Arp H. P. H.; Knutsen H. Could We Spare a Moment of the Spotlight for Persistent, Water-Soluble Polymers?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (1), 3–5. 10.1021/acs.est.9b07089. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mairinger T.; Loos M.; Hollender J. Characterization of Water-Soluble Synthetic Polymeric Substances in Wastewater Using LC-HRMS/MS. Water Res. 2021, 190, 11674510.1016/j.watres.2020.116745. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pauelsen F.; Huppertsberg S.; Knepper T. P.; Zahn D. Narrowing the Analytical Gap for Water-Soluble Polymers: A Novel Trace-Analytical Method and First Quantitative Occurrence Data for Polyethylene Oxide in Surface and Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 882, 16356310.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163563. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources