Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 22;3(8):101095.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101095. eCollection 2024 Aug.

PARCCS: A Machine Learning Risk-Prediction Model for Acute Peripartum Cardiovascular Complications During Delivery Admissions

Affiliations

PARCCS: A Machine Learning Risk-Prediction Model for Acute Peripartum Cardiovascular Complications During Delivery Admissions

Salman Zahid et al. JACC Adv. .

Abstract

Background: Maternal mortality in the United States remains high, with cardiovascular (CV) complications being a leading cause.

Objectives: The purpose of this paper was to develop the PARCCS (Prediction of Acute Risk for Cardiovascular Complications in the Peripartum Period Score) for acute CV complications during delivery.

Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes to identify delivery admissions were used. Acute CV/renal complications were defined as a composite of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, peripartum cardiomyopathy, renal complications, venous thromboembolism, arrhythmias, and pulmonary edema. A risk prediction model, PARCCS, was developed using machine learning consisting of 14 variables and scored out of 100 points.

Results: Of the 2,371,661 pregnant patients analyzed, 7.0% had acute CV complications during delivery hospitalization. Patients with CV complications had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and were more likely to be of Black race and lower income. The PARCCS variables included electrolyte imbalances (13 points [p]), age (3p for age <20 years), cesarean delivery (4p), obesity (5p), pre-existing heart failure (28p), multiple gestations (4p), Black race (2p), gestational hypertension (3p), low income (1p), gestational diabetes (2p), chronic diabetes (6p), prior stroke (22p), coagulopathy (5p), and nonelective admission (2p). Using the validation set, the performance of the model was evaluated with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.68 and a 95% CI of 0.67 to 0.68.

Conclusions: PARCCS has the potential to be an important tool for identifying pregnant individuals at risk of acute peripartum CV complications at the time of delivery. Future studies should further validate this score and determine whether it can improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: CVD; cardiovascular disease; machine learning; preeclampsia; risk prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Michos is supported by the Amato Fund for Women’s Cardiovascular Health Research at 10.13039/100005542Johns Hopkins University and by an 10.13039/100000968American Heart Association grant (946222). Dr Hays is supported in part by 10.13039/100000050NHLBI grant R01HL159715. Dr Minhas is supported by 10.13039/100000002NIH grant KL2TR003099. Dr Michos has done consulting for Amgen, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Edwards Lifesciences, Esperion, Ionis, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Flow Diagram Variable ranking and transformation: The described machine learning method employs a random forest algorithm to generate decision trees, utilizing bootstrapping to reduce overfitting. Variable ranking based on mean decrease impurity measurement aids in selecting important variables that undergo a transformation, such as stratifying continuous variables like age into categories. Intermediate model analysis: The scoring model's performance was evaluated by varying the number of variables, and the optimal trade-off between model complexity and prediction accuracy was determined through a parsimony plot. Final model analysis: The performance of the chosen model was subsequently assessed using the testing dataset. ICD-10 = International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision.
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
PARCCS: A Machine Learning Risk-Prediction Model A total of 14 variables were selected based on predictive ability as well as clinical relevance. On performance evaluation using the same testing dataset, an area under the curve of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.67-0.68) was achieved. The PARCCS has a total score range of 0 to 100.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Parsimony Plot In the initial stage, 20 variables were ranked. This was subsequently narrowed down to 14 variables, which led to the creation of a parsimonious model. Additional variables beyond the chosen 14 did not contribute significantly to improving the model's performance. Detailed information regarding this selection process can be found in the methods section. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve AUC = area under the curve.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mehta L.S., Warnes C.A., Bradley E., et al. Cardiovascular considerations in caring for pregnant patients: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2020;141:e884–e903. - PubMed
    1. GBD US Health Disparities Collaborators Life expectancy by county, race, and ethnicity in the USA, 2000-19: a systematic analysis of health disparities. Lancet. 2022;400:25–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Center for Health Statistics . 2022. A Reference Guide for Certification Of Deaths Associated With Pregnancy On Death Certificates.
    1. Fleszar L.G., Bryant A.S., Johnson C.O., et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Trends in state-level maternal mortality by racial and ethnic group in the United States. JAMA. 2023;330:52–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ford N.D., Cox S., Ko J.Y., et al. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and mortality at delivery hospitalization - United States, 2017-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:585–591. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources