Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 2;17(8):sfae199.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae199. eCollection 2024 Aug.

CA125 outperforms NT-proBNP in the prediction of maximum aerobic capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and kidney dysfunction

Affiliations

CA125 outperforms NT-proBNP in the prediction of maximum aerobic capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and kidney dysfunction

Gonzalo Núñez-Marín et al. Clin Kidney J. .

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Clin Kidney J. 2024 Nov 20;17(11):sfae344. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae344. eCollection 2024 Nov. Clin Kidney J. 2024. PMID: 39569315 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) often coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Exercise intolerance is a major determinant of quality of life and morbidity in both scenarios. We aimed to evaluate the associations between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) with maximal aerobic capacity (peak VO2) in ambulatory HFpEF and whether these associations were influenced by kidney function.

Methods: This single-centre study prospectively enrolled 133 patients with HFpEF who performed maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Patients were stratified across estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) categories (<60 ml/min/1.73 m2 versus ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2).

Results: The mean age of the sample was 73.2 ± 10.5 years and 56.4% were female. The median of peak VO2 was 11.0 ml/kg/min (interquartile range 9.0-13.0). A total of 67 (50.4%) patients had an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Those patients had higher levels of NT-proBNP and lower peak VO2, without differences in CA125. In the whole sample, NT-proBNP and CA125 were inversely correlated with peak VO2 (r = -0.43, P < .001 and r = -0.22, P = .010, respectively). After multivariate analysis, we found a differential association between NT-proBNP and peak VO2 across eGFR strata (P for interaction = .045). In patients with an eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2, higher NT-proBNP identified patients with poorer maximal functional capacity. In individuals with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, NT-proBNP was not significantly associated with peak VO2 [β = 0.02 (95% confidence interval -0.19-0.23), P = .834]. Higher CA125 was linear and significantly associated with worse functional capacity without evidence of heterogeneity across eGFR strata (P for interaction = .620).

Conclusions: In patients with stable HFpEF, NT-proBNP was not associated with maximal functional capacity when CKD was present. CA125 emerged as a useful biomarker for estimating effort intolerance in HFpEF irrespective of the presence of CKD.

Keywords: CA125; HFpEF; cardiorenal syndrome; maximal aerobic capacity; natriuretic peptides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.N. is a member of the CKJ editorial board. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow chart of the protocol used for the enrolment of patients in this study. CHF: chronic heart failure.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Association between NT-proBNP levels and peak VO2 across eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 versus <60 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Association between NT-proBNP levels and peak VO2 across eGFR ≥60, 30–<60 and <30 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Association between CA125 levels and peak VO2 across eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 versus <60 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Association between CA125 levels and peak VO2 across eGFR ≥60, 30–<60 and <30 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599–726. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022;145:e895–1032. - PubMed
    1. Redfield MM, Borlaug BA. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a review. JAMA 2023;329:827–38. 10.1001/jama.2023.2020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belén Méndez A, Azancot MA, Olivella A et al. New aspects in cardiorenal syndrome and HFpEF. Clin Kidney J 2022;15:1807–15. 10.1093/ckj/sfac133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mark PB, Mangion K, Rankin AJ et al. Left ventricular dysfunction with preserved ejection fraction: the most common left ventricular disorder in chronic kidney disease patients HFpEF and CKD patients. Clin Kidney J 2022;15:2186–99. 10.1093/ckj/sfac146 - DOI - PMC - PubMed