Ethics of abortion in transplantation
- PMID: 39136962
- DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001172
Ethics of abortion in transplantation
Abstract
Purpose of review: The controversial medical procedure of abortion is the subject of this article. It argues that for transplant patients, including recipients, abortion is ethical.
Recent findings: In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned the long-standing decision of Roe v. Wade. This decision has led to a socio-legal environment where obtaining an abortion is impossible for some patients. However, the moral position relating to patients who have undergone transplants or are on a waiting list has been largely overlooked. End-stage renal, liver, and heart disease presents a hazardous situation for pregnancy, posing risks to both the fetus and the pregnant person. The abortion procedure is medically safer and allows a patient to proceed with a transplant. Limiting access to abortion or preventing it altogether will have a significant negative impact on transplant patients. The ethical analysis of abortion can be likened to compelling a relative or loved one of a transplant recipient to donate an organ to their family member or loved one.
Summary: This article emphasizes the importance of maintaining the legal availability of abortion for transplant patients. Allowing abortions in transplant patients upholds ethical parity, as seen in the analogous situation of live organ donation.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Post-Roe v Wade psychiatry: legal, clinical, and ethical challenges in psychiatry under abortion bans.Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;11(10):853-862. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00096-8. Epub 2024 May 22. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38795722 Review.
-
Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1695-1696. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18453. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36318123
-
Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;230(5):532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.026. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 37914062
-
Navigating Loss of Abortion Services - A Large Academic Medical Center Prepares for the Overturn of Roe v. Wade.N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 2;386(22):2061-2064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2206246. Epub 2022 May 11. N Engl J Med. 2022. PMID: 35544368 No abstract available.
-
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995. J Leg Med. 1995. PMID: 8568420 Review.
References
-
- Christopher P. The disorderly origin of ‘ORDERED LIBERTY’. Texas Bar J 2023; 86:3031.
-
- Pew Research Center, Diamant J, Mohamed B. What the data says about abortion in the U.S. [Internet]. 2023; https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/25/what-the-data-says-ab...
-
- Sarah C. M. Roberts, Ushma D. Upadhyay, Guodong Liu, et al. Association of facility type with procedural-related morbidities and adverse events among patients undergoing induced abortions. JAMA 2018; 319:2497.
-
- Kortsmit K, Mandel MG, Reeves J, et al. Abortion surveillance — United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ 2021; 70:1–29.
-
- Attini R, Cabiddu G, Montersino B, et al. Contraception in chronic kidney disease: a best practice position statement by the Kidney and Pregnancy Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology. J Nephrol 2020; 33:1343–1359.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials