Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 1;29(6):394-399.
doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001172. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Ethics of abortion in transplantation

Hector C Ramos  1 , Allison Hill  2
Affiliations
Review

Ethics of abortion in transplantation

Hector C Ramos et al. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The controversial medical procedure of abortion is the subject of this article. It argues that for transplant patients, including recipients, abortion is ethical.

Recent findings: In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned the long-standing decision of Roe v. Wade. This decision has led to a socio-legal environment where obtaining an abortion is impossible for some patients. However, the moral position relating to patients who have undergone transplants or are on a waiting list has been largely overlooked. End-stage renal, liver, and heart disease presents a hazardous situation for pregnancy, posing risks to both the fetus and the pregnant person. The abortion procedure is medically safer and allows a patient to proceed with a transplant. Limiting access to abortion or preventing it altogether will have a significant negative impact on transplant patients. The ethical analysis of abortion can be likened to compelling a relative or loved one of a transplant recipient to donate an organ to their family member or loved one.

Summary: This article emphasizes the importance of maintaining the legal availability of abortion for transplant patients. Allowing abortions in transplant patients upholds ethical parity, as seen in the analogous situation of live organ donation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Christopher P. The disorderly origin of ‘ORDERED LIBERTY’. Texas Bar J 2023; 86:3031.
    1. Pew Research Center, Diamant J, Mohamed B. What the data says about abortion in the U.S. [Internet]. 2023; https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/25/what-the-data-says-ab...
    1. Sarah C. M. Roberts, Ushma D. Upadhyay, Guodong Liu, et al. Association of facility type with procedural-related morbidities and adverse events among patients undergoing induced abortions. JAMA 2018; 319:2497.
    1. Kortsmit K, Mandel MG, Reeves J, et al. Abortion surveillance — United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ 2021; 70:1–29.
    1. Attini R, Cabiddu G, Montersino B, et al. Contraception in chronic kidney disease: a best practice position statement by the Kidney and Pregnancy Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology. J Nephrol 2020; 33:1343–1359.

MeSH terms