Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):213.
doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01395-1.

CT-based surrogate parameters for MRI-based disc height and endplate degeneration in the lumbar spine

Affiliations

CT-based surrogate parameters for MRI-based disc height and endplate degeneration in the lumbar spine

Thorsten Jentzsch et al. BMC Med Imaging. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated potential use of computed tomography (CT)-based parameters in the lumbar spine as a surrogate for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based findings.

Methods: In this retrospective study, all individuals, who had a lumbar spine CT scan and MRI between 2006 and 2012 were reviewed (n = 198). Disc height (DH) and endplate degeneration (ED) were evaluated between Th12/L1-L5/S1. Statistics consisted of Spearman correlation and univariate/multivariable regression (adjusting for age and gender).

Results: The mean CT-DH increased kranio-caudally (8.04 millimeters (mm) at T12/L1, 9.17 mm at L1/2, 10.59 mm at L2/3, 11.34 mm at L3/4, 11.42 mm at L4/5 and 10.47 mm at L5/S1). MRI-ED was observed in 58 (29%) individuals. CT-DH and MRI-DH had strong to very strong correlations (rho 0.781-0.904, p < .001). MRI-DH showed higher absolute values than CT-DH (mean of 1.76 mm). There was a significant association between CT-DH and MRI-ED at L2/3 (p = .006), L3/4 (p = .002), L4/5 (p < .001) and L5/S1 (p < .001). A calculated cut-off point was set at 11 mm.

Conclusions: In the lumbar spine, there is a correlation between disc height on CT and MRI. This can be useful in trauma and emergency cases, where CT is readily available in the lack of an MRI. In addition, in the middle and lower part of the lumbar spine, loss of disc height on CT scans is associated with more pronounced endplate degeneration on MRIs. If the disc height on CT scans is lower than 11 mm, endplate degeneration on MRIs is likely more pronounced.

Level and design: Level III, a retrospective study.

Keywords: CT; Disc degeneration; Disc height; Endplate degeneration; MRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Magnetic resonance imaging (T1- and T2-weighted) and computed tomography of the lumbar spine. Sagittal MRI (T1- [left] and T2-weighted [middle]) images as well as CT (right) image of the lumbar spine
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Disc height (DH) in the lumbar spine. Sagittal MRI (T1-weighted [left]) and CT (right) images with examples of DH measurements (millimeters [mm]) at L1/2 and L3/4
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Endplate degeneration (ED) in the lumbar spine. Sagittal MRI (T1- [left] and T2-weighted [right]) images of the lumbar spine. Grade 1 (top), grade 2 (middle) and grade 3 (bottom) of ED

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jeong JG et al. Biomechanical Effect of Disc Height on the Components of the Lumbar Column at the Same Axial Load: A Finite-Element Study. J Healthc Eng. 2022;2022:7069448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohd Isa IL et al. Discogenic low back Pain: anatomy, pathophysiology and treatments of intervertebral disc degeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 2022. 24(1). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Battié MC, et al. Genetic and environmental effects on disc degeneration by phenotype and spinal level: a multivariate twin study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(25):2801–8. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818043b7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams MA, Dolan P. Spine Biomech J Biomech. 2005;38(10):1972–83. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(18):2151–61. 10.1097/01.brs.0000231761.73859.2c - DOI - PubMed