Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 13;19(1):295.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03300-z.

Burden of rare genetic disorders in India: twenty-two years' experience of a tertiary centre

Affiliations

Burden of rare genetic disorders in India: twenty-two years' experience of a tertiary centre

Jayesh Sheth et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Rare disorders comprise of ~ 7500 different conditions affecting multiple systems. Diagnosis of rare diseases is complex due to dearth of specialized medical professionals, testing labs and limited therapeutic options. There is scarcity of data on the prevalence of rare diseases in different populations. India being home to a large population comprising of 4600 population groups, of which several thousand are endogamous, is likely to have a high burden of rare diseases. The present study provides a retrospective overview of a cohort of patients with rare genetic diseases identified at a tertiary genetic test centre in India.

Results: Overall, 3294 patients with 305 rare diseases were identified in the present study cohort. These were categorized into 14 disease groups based on the major organ/ organ system affected. Highest number of rare diseases (D = 149/305, 48.9%) were identified in the neuromuscular and neurodevelopmental (NMND) group followed by inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) (D = 47/305; 15.4%). Majority patients in the present cohort (N = 1992, 61%) were diagnosed under IEM group, of which Gaucher disease constituted maximum cases (N = 224, 11.2%). Under the NMND group, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (N = 291/885, 32.9%), trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders (N = 242/885; 27.3%) and spinal muscular atrophy (N = 141/885, 15.9%) were the most common. Majority cases of β-thalassemia (N = 120/149, 80.5%) and cystic fibrosis (N = 74/75, 98.7%) under the haematological and pulmonary groups were observed, respectively. Founder variants were identified for Tay-Sachs disease and mucopolysaccharidosis IVA diseases. Recurrent variants for Gaucher disease (GBA:c.1448T > C), β-thalassemia (HBB:c.92.+5G > C), non-syndromic hearing loss (GJB2:c.71G > A), albinism (TYR:c.832 C > T), congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CYP21A2:c.29-13 C > G) and progressive pseudo rheumatoid dysplasia (CCN6:c.298T > A) were observed in the present study.

Conclusion: The present retrospective study of rare disease patients diagnosed at a tertiary genetic test centre provides first insight into the distribution of rare genetic diseases across the country. This information will likely aid in drafting future health policies, including newborn screening programs, development of target specific panel for affordable diagnosis of rare diseases and eventually build a platform for devising novel treatment strategies for rare diseases.

Keywords: Common variant; Diagnosis; Founder variant; IEM; India; Lysosomal storage diseases; Neurodevelopmental disorders; Neuromuscular; Prevalence; Rare diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the diagnostic test pathway used for testing rare genetic diseases. CPK = creatine phosphokinase; DMD = Duchenne muscular dystrophy; SMA; spinal muscular atrophy; LGMD = Limb girdle muscular dystrophy; MLPA = Multiplex ligation probe dependent amplification; NGS = Next generation sequencing; RFLP-PCR = Restriction fragment length polymorphism- polymerase chain reaction; GAG = Glycosaminoglycan; NPD = Niemman-Pick disease; MPS = Mucopolysaccharidosis; ML = Mucolipidosis; TP-PCR = Triplet prime repeat polymerase chain reaction
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage distribution of patients with rare genetic diseases diagnosed under the 14 disease groups

References

    1. Nguengang Wakap S, Lambert DM, Olry A, Rodwell C, Gueydan C, Lanneau V, et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur J Hum Genet EJHG. 2020;28(2):165–73. 10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee CE, Singleton KS, Wallin M, Faundez V. Rare genetic diseases: Nature’s experiments on Human Development. iScience. 2020;23(5):101123. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramalle-Gómara E, Domínguez-Garrido E, Gómez-Eguílaz M, Marzo-Sola ME, Ramón-Trapero JL. Gil-de-Gómez J. Education and information needs for physicians about rare diseases in Spain. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):18. 10.1186/s13023-019-1285-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vandeborne L, van Overbeeke E, Dooms M, De Beleyr B, Huys I. Information needs of physicians regarding the diagnosis of rare diseases: a questionnaire-based study in Belgium. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1):99. 10.1186/s13023-019-1075-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gahl WA, Mulvihill JJ, Toro C, Markello TC, Wise AL, Ramoni RB, et al. The NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Program and Network: applications to modern medicine. Mol Genet Metab. 2016;117(4):393–400. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.01.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources