Patient experience of social and medical fertility preservation fully reimbursed in France
- PMID: 39138766
- PMCID: PMC11534921
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03222-6
Patient experience of social and medical fertility preservation fully reimbursed in France
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to review patient experience with social fertility preservation (sFP), as compared to medical fertility preservation (mFP), in a context where sFP is fully reimbursed.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation for mFP between 2017 and 2023 and sFP between 2022 and 2023 at a large ART single center. Additionally, we surveyed patients undergoing sFP and mFP, regarding their experiences, intentions, awareness, and financial consideration.
Results: A total of 97 oocyte retrievals were performed for sFP in 75 women, and 155 were performed in mFP (127 women). Median ages were 36.4 years for sFP and 28.9 years for mFP. Median oocytes retrieved per session were 10 for sFP and 8 for mFP. Ninety-seven percent of of mFP participants were informed by healthcare professionals, while half of sFP participants learned through personal acquaintances. The primary motivation for sFP was a desire for pregnancy while being single. Most respondents in both groups knew that 15-20 oocytes are typically needed for a successful birth. None were aware of the "DuoStim" option, but interest was expressed by most women. Surprisingly, despite full reimbursement for sFP in France, 78% expressed willingness to pay if necessary.
Conclusion: Many women choose sFP due to concerns about declining fertility, often informed by non-medical sources. Free access to sFP can help mitigate the global decline in natality by allowing women to anticipate age-related fertility decline. This study should be considered by other countries as they may increasingly cover sFP costs in the future.
Keywords: Cost reproductive treatment; Experience; Fertility preservation; Oocyte cryopreservation/ freezing; Social/non-medical/medical egg freezing.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Survey of Women Who Cryopreserved Oocytes for Non-medical Indications (Social Fertility Preservation).Reprod Sci. 2021 Aug;28(8):2216-2222. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00460-2. Epub 2021 Jan 15. Reprod Sci. 2021. PMID: 33449346
-
The importance of social oocyte cryopreservation in supporting local municipalities: A prospective study.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241276256. doi: 10.1177/17455057241276256. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39254121 Free PMC article.
-
A 10-year follow-up of reproductive outcomes in women attempting motherhood after elective oocyte cryopreservation.Hum Reprod. 2024 Feb 1;39(2):355-363. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead267. Hum Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38145619
-
Planned oocyte cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Oct 1;30(5):558-568. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae009. Hum Reprod Update. 2024. PMID: 38654466
-
Return rates and pregnancy outcomes after oocyte preservation for planned fertility delay: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2024 Nov;122(5):902-917. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.06.025. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Fertil Steril. 2024. PMID: 38964588
References
-
- Bunge RG, Sherman JK. Fertilizing capacity of frozen human spermatozoa. Nature. 1953;172(4382):767–8. - PubMed
-
- Hagege E, Sokteang S, Ayoubi JM, de Ziegler D. Fertility preservation counseling: old indications, novel perspectives. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(4):553–4. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.004. - PubMed
-
- Teo UL, Kakkar P, El-Toukhy T. Current perspectives on social oocyte freezing. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(3):370–8. - PubMed
-
- Gil-Arribas E, Blockeel C, Pennings G, Nekkebroeck J, Velasco JAG, Serna J, et al. Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: a SWOT analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2022;44(6):1005–14. - PubMed
-
- Cascante SD, Berkeley AS, Licciardi F, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Planned oocyte cryopreservation: the state of the ART. Reprod BioMed Online. 2023;47(6):103367. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources