Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov;25(11):287-297.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-024-01222-8. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

Unraveling the Complexities of Uretero-Enteric Strictures: A Modern Review

Affiliations
Review

Unraveling the Complexities of Uretero-Enteric Strictures: A Modern Review

A Abdalla et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review article is to provide a contemporary overview of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture (UAS) management and outcomes.

Recent findings: In this article, we will review the most recent studies investigating UAS and evaluate etiology, potential risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and management options, along with personal insight gained from our experience with managing this challenging reconstructive complication. Benign UAS is a relatively common long-term complication of intestinal urinary diversion, affecting approximately 1 in 10 patients. It is thought to be caused by ureteral tissue ischemia and fibrosis at the anastomotic site. Risk factors appear to include any that increase the likelihood of leak or ischemia; it is not clear if anastomotic approach impacts risk for stricture as well. Management options are varied and include endourologic, open, and robotic approaches. Endoscopic approaches may be less morbid but are considerably less effective than reconstruction performed after a period of ureteral rest.

Keywords: Postoperative complication; Radical cystectomy; Stricture; Ureteroenteric anastomosis; Urinary diversion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. •D. Y, Yang SA, Boorjian MB, Westerman RF, Tarrell P, Thapa, Viers BR. Persistent, long-term risk for ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture formation: the case for long term follow-up. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(1):142–50. Relevant paper highlighting the continual risk for uretero-enteric strictures many years after surgery. - DOI
    1. Amin KA, et al. Predictors of Benign Ureteroenteric Anastomotic strictures after Radical Cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology. 2020;144:225–9. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Shah SH, et al. Ureteroenteric strictures after Open Radical Cystectomy and urinary diversion: The University of Southern California experience. Urology. 2015;86(1):87–91. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Reesink DJ, Gerritsen SL, Kelder H, Van Melick HHE, Stijns PEF. Evaluation of Ureteroenteric Anastomotic strictures after the introduction of Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: results from a large Tertiary Referral Center. J Urol. 2021;205(4):1119–24. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Samavedi Mssmmdk, Adiyat KT. Is the incidence of uretero-intestinal anastomotic stricture increased in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with previous pelvic radiation? BJU Int. 2010;105:795–8. - PubMed - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources