Survival Outcomes of Transoral Microsurgery in T3/T4a Laryngeal Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39140205
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.31695
Survival Outcomes of Transoral Microsurgery in T3/T4a Laryngeal Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objective: To critically evaluate oncological and functional outcomes following transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in patients with T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
Data sources: A comprehensive search of five major databases-PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science-was conducted using a combination of relevant keywords and MeSH terms.
Review methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of odds ratio (OR), hazards ratio (HR), and proportion, focusing on oncological and functional outcomes of TLM in advanced T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic tumors. A random-effects meta-analysis model was employed.
Results: The review incorporated 29 cohort studies, representing a total of 1,897 patients undergoing TLM for T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic SCC. The cumulative 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for T3 glottic and supraglottic tumors was 44.4% (95% CI: 47-66%) and 62.8% (95% CI: 63-81%), while the 5-year DFS for T4 glottic and supraglottic tumors was 41.1% (95% CI: 33.4-49.2%) and 32.9% (95% CI: 19.3-50.1%), respectively. T3 glottic tumors exhibited a 2.5-fold significantly higher odds of local recurrence post-TLM compared to their T3 supraglottic tumors (95% CI: 1.6-3.9, p < 0.0001). Laryngeal preservation rates for T3glottic and supraglottic tumors were 68.9% (95% CI: 48.7-83.8%) and 88.4% (95% CI: 79.4-93.8%), respectively. Both groups showed comparable rates of tracheostomy (p = 0.48) and gastrostomy performed (p = 0.17).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that TLM is a viable larynx preservation approach in select patients with T3/T4a glottic and supraglottic tumors. However, glottic tumors may have less favorable outcomes after TLM compared to those with advanced supraglottic tumors.
Level of evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 135:15-26, 2025.
Keywords: advanced laryngeal tumors; meta‐analysis; oncologic outcome; prognosis; recurrence; survival.
© 2024 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209‐249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
-
- Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell LH, et al. Laryngeal cancer in the United States: changes in demographics, patterns of care, and survival. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(9 Pt 2 Suppl 111):1‐13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000236095.97947.26
-
- Chen AY, Fedewa S, Zhu J. Temporal trends in the treatment of early‐ and advanced‐stage laryngeal cancer in the United States, 1985‐2007. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(10):1017‐1024. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.171
-
- Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2091‐2098. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031317
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
