Caesarean section and associated factors in Nigeria: assessing inequalities between rural and urban areas-insights from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018
- PMID: 39143541
- PMCID: PMC11325716
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06722-6
Caesarean section and associated factors in Nigeria: assessing inequalities between rural and urban areas-insights from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018
Abstract
Introduction: When medically indicated, caesarean section (CS) can be a life-saving intervention for mothers and their newborns. This study assesses the prevalence of CS and its associated factors, focussing on inequalities between rural and urban areas in Nigeria.
Methods: We disaggregated the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018 and performed analyses separately for Nigeria's overall, rural, and urban residences. We summarised data using frequency tabulations and identified factors associated with CS through multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Results: CS prevalence was 2.7% in Nigeria (overall), 5.2% in urban and 1.2% in rural areas. The North-West region had the lowest prevalence of 0.7%, 1.5% and 0.4% for the overall, urban and rural areas, respectively. Mothers with higher education demonstrated a greater CS prevalence of 14.0% overall, 15.3% in urban and 9.7% in rural residences. Frequent internet use increased CS prevalence nationally (14.3%) and in urban (15.1%) and rural (10.1%) residences. The southern regions showed higher CS prevalence, with the South-West leading overall (7.0%) and in rural areas (3.3%), and the South-South highest in urban areas (8.5%). Across all residences, rich wealth index, maternal age ≥ 35, lower birth order, and ≥ eight antenatal (ANC) contacts increased the odds of a CS. In rural Nigeria, husbands' education, spouses' joint healthcare decisions, birth size, and unplanned pregnancy increased CS odds. In urban Nigeria, multiple births, Christianity, frequent internet use, and ease of getting permission to visit healthcare facilities were associated with higher likelihood of CS.
Conclusion: CS utilisation remains low in Nigeria and varies across rural-urban, regional, and socioeconomic divides. Targeted interventions are imperative for uneducated and socioeconomically disadvantaged mothers across all regions, as well as for mothers in urban areas who adhere to Islam, traditional, or 'other' religions. Comprehensive intervention measures should prioritise educational opportunities and resources, especially for rural areas, awareness campaigns on the benefits of medically indicated CS, and engagement with community and religious leaders to promote acceptance using culturally and religiously sensitive approaches. Other practical strategies include promoting optimal ANC contacts, expanding internet access and digital literacy, especially for rural women (e.g., through community Wi-Fi programs), improving healthcare infrastructure and accessibility in regions with low CS prevalence, particularly in the North-West, and implementing socioeconomic empowerment programs, especially for women in rural areas.
Keywords: Caesarean section; Childbirth; Emergency obstetric care; Inequalities; Maternal-child health; Nigeria; Rural-urban differences.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Antenatal care utilisation and receipt of its components in Nigeria: Assessing disparities between rural and urban areas-A nationwide population-based study.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 15;19(7):e0307316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307316. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39008484 Free PMC article.
-
Cesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors-a population-based cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e027273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027273. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31213450 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care services in Nigeria: A comparative study of rural and urban residences based on the 2013 Nigeria demographic and health survey.PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0197324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197324. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29782511 Free PMC article.
-
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30322584 Review.
-
Assessment of the differences in Mean Age at Menarche (MAM) among adolescent girls in rural and urban Nigeria: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3468. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21054-y. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39695506 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Cesarean Delivery Trends in Conflict-Affected Settings: Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes at a Rural Referral Hospital in Yemen.Cureus. 2025 Apr 10;17(4):e82027. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82027. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40352045 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of cesarean section in urban areas of Bangladesh: Insights from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey-2022.Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251356806. doi: 10.1177/17455057251356806. Epub 2025 Aug 11. Womens Health (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40785446 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Pregnancy: Efficacy, Safety, and Future Implications for Perinatal Mental Health Care.Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70304. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70304. Brain Behav. 2025. PMID: 39924949 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sung S, Mahdy H. Cesarean Section. [Updated 2023 Jul 9]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546707/ - PubMed
-
- Gibbons L, et al. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Rep. 2010;30:1–31.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical