Empirical Therapy Versus Tailored Therapy of Helicobacter pylori in Korea: Results of the K-CREATE Study
- PMID: 39143948
- DOI: 10.1111/hel.13126
Empirical Therapy Versus Tailored Therapy of Helicobacter pylori in Korea: Results of the K-CREATE Study
Abstract
Background: The optimal duration of regimens for tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance for clarithromycin has yet to be established.
Aim: This study was a nationwide, multicenter, randomized trial comparing empirical therapy with tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance for first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We also compared the eradication rates of 7- and 14-day regimens for each group.
Patients and methods: Patients with H. pylori infection were first randomized to receive empirical or tailored therapy. Patients in each group were further randomized into 7- or 14-day regimens. Empirical therapy consisted of a triple therapy (TT) regimen (twice-daily doses of pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg) for 7 or 14 days. Tailored therapy consisted of TT of 7 or 14 days in patients without genotypic resistance. Patients with genotypic resistance were treated with bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) regimens (twice-daily doses of pantoprazole 40 mg, three daily doses of metronidazole 500 mg, and four times daily doses of bismuth 300 mg and tetracycline 500 mg) for 7 or 14 days. A 13C-urea breath test assessed eradication rates. The primary outcome was eradication rates of each group.
Results: A total of 593 patients were included in the study. The eradication rates were 65.7% (201/306) in the empirical therapy group and 81.9% (235/287) in the tailored therapy group for intention-to-treat analysis (p < 0.001). In the per-protocol analysis, the eradication rates of the empirical therapy and tailored groups were 70.3% (201/286) and 85.5% (235/274) (p < 0.001), respectively. There was no difference in compliance between the two groups. The rate of adverse events was higher in the tailored group compared to the empirical group (p < 0.001).
Discussion: Our study confirmed that tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance was more effective than empirical therapy for H. pylori eradication in Korea. However, no significant difference was found between 7- and 14-day regimens for each group. Future studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy for empirical and tailored therapy regimens.
Keywords: Helicobacter; PCR; drug resistance; eradication; tailored therapy.
© 2024 The Author(s). Helicobacter published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- A. Savoldi, E. Carrara, D. Y. Graham, M. Conti, and E. Tacconelli, “Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis in World Health Organization Regions,” Gastroenterology 155 (2018): 1372–1382.
-
- E. J. Gong, S. C. Yun, H. Y. Jung, et al., “Meta‐Analysis of First‐Line Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Korea: Is It Time to Change?” Journal of Korean Medical Science 29 (2014): 704–713.
-
- Y. T. Kuo, J. M. Liou, E. M. El‐Omar, et al., “Primary Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori in the Asia‐Pacific Region: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2 (2017): 707–715.
-
- P. Malfertheiner, F. Megraud, T. Rokkas, et al., “Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection: The Maastricht VI/Florence Consensus Report,” Gut 71 (2022): 1724–1762, https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl‐2022‐327745.
-
- I. Kim, L. S. Maeng, J. S. Kim, et al., “Quantitative Multiplex Real‐Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori and Clarithromycin Resistance,” BMC Microbiology 23 (2023): 155.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical