Is Kindergarten Ability Group Placement Biased? New Data, New Methods, New Answers
- PMID: 39144401
- PMCID: PMC11323065
- DOI: 10.3102/00028312211061410
Is Kindergarten Ability Group Placement Biased? New Data, New Methods, New Answers
Abstract
Half of kindergarten teachers split children into higher and lower ability groups for reading or math. In national data, we predicted kindergarten ability group placement using linear and ordinal logistic regression with classroom fixed effects. In fall, test scores were the best predictors of group placement, but there was bias favoring girls, high-SES (socioeconomic status) children, and Asian Americans, who received higher placements than their scores alone would predict. Net of SES, there was no bias against placing black children in higher groups. By spring, one third of kindergartners moved groups, and high-SES children moved up more than their score gains alone would predict. Teacher-reported behaviors (e.g., attentiveness, approaches to learning) helped explain girls' higher placements, but did little to explain the higher placements of Asian American and high-SES children.
Keywords: ability grouping; elementary schools; regression analyses; tracking.
Similar articles
-
Childhood overweight and academic performance: national study of kindergartners and first-graders.Obes Res. 2004 Jan;12(1):58-68. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.9. Obes Res. 2004. PMID: 14742843
-
Mindset × Context: Schools, Classrooms, and the Unequal Translation of Expectations into Math Achievement.Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2023 Sep;88(2):7-109. doi: 10.1111/mono.12471. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2023. PMID: 37574937
-
Relationship between visual motor integration skill and academic performance in kindergarten through third grade.Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Mar;76(3):159-63. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199903000-00015. Optom Vis Sci. 1999. PMID: 10213445
-
Targeted school-based interventions for improving reading and mathematics for students with or at risk of academic difficulties in Grades K-6: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 6;17(2):e1152. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1152. eCollection 2021 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 37131926 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;20(2):e1417. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1417. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38911050 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Allen MJ, & Yen WM. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
-
- Allison PD. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114. 10.2307/271083 - DOI
-
- Allison PD. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (1st ed.). Sage.
-
- Antonacci P. (2000). Reading in the zone of proximal development: Mediating literacy development in beginner readers through guided reading. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 41(1), Article 2. https://scholarworks.w-mich.edu/reading_horizons/vol41/iss1/2
-
- Baetschmann G, Ballantyne A, Staub KE, & Winkelmann R. (2020). feologit: A new command for fitting fixed-effects ordered logit models. The Stata Journal, 20(2), 253–275.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources