Patient Satisfaction Following Non-Operative Treatment of Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Case-Control Study
- PMID: 39144450
- PMCID: PMC11322922
- DOI: 10.1177/21514593241273312
Patient Satisfaction Following Non-Operative Treatment of Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Case-Control Study
Abstract
Introduction: A minority of geriatric hip fracture patients pursue non-operative treatment. Compared with surgical patients, non-operative patients have higher mortality rates. However, patient satisfaction following non-operative vs operative treatment has not been investigated extensively. The purpose of this study was to compare satisfaction among non-operatively vs operatively treated hip fracture patients.
Methods: We identified patients aged 60+ years with proximal femur fractures treated over a 10-year period. Excluded were patients with isolated greater/lesser trochanteric fractures. Patients or relatives were asked to complete a 6-question survey about their treatment satisfaction.
Results: Survey responses from 56 operative and 28 non-operative patients were recorded. Overall, 91.1% of operative and 82.1% of non-operative patients were satisfied with their treatment course (P = 0.260). However, only 71.4% of non-operative patients were satisfied with treatment option explanations vs 83.9% of operative patients (P = 0.014). While only 64.3% of non-operative respondents were satisfied with the ultimate treatment outcome (vs 85.7% of operative patients, P = 0.025), 89.3% of patients in each cohort would choose the same treatment plan again.
Discussion: Our findings highlight the complexity of defining patient satisfaction, particularly in a geriatric hip fracture population. Unlike previous studies, we chose a direct approach to quantifying patient satisfaction by asking participants specifically about satisfaction with treatment outcome and the overall treatment course. Additional survey questions were then included to assess factors considered important in treatment satisfaction, such as health care provider treatment explanations, post-treatment mobility, and palliative care service involvement.
Conclusions: We identified significant differences between non-operatively and operatively treated geriatric hip fracture patients regarding satisfaction with the explanation of treatment options, and ultimate treatment outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction with the treatment course or likelihood of choosing the same treatment again. Further research investigating patient satisfaction following geriatric hip fracture treatment is warranted.
Keywords: III; femoral neck fractures; geriatric; hemiarthroplasty; hip fractures; intertrochanteric fractures; intramedullary nailing; mobility; non-operative; operative; percutaneous screws; satisfaction; sliding hip screw; trauma.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Mortality Rates After Nonoperative Geriatric Hip Fracture Treatment: A Matched Cohort Analysis.J Orthop Trauma. 2023 May 1;37(5):237-242. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002549. J Orthop Trauma. 2023. PMID: 36728997
-
Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2132-2144. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001306. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32496321 Free PMC article.
-
Sliding Hip Screw and Side Plate for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Feb 16;12(1):e19.00038. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00038. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022. PMID: 35685237 Free PMC article.
-
Fractures of the femoral neck: a review and personal statement.Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006;73(1):45-59. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006. PMID: 16613748 Review.
-
Is the increased use of intramedullary nailing over DHS for intertrochanteric hip fractures justified? - A review of the Irish hip fracture database 2016 -2020.Surgeon. 2024 Feb;22(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.09.002. Epub 2023 Oct 3. Surgeon. 2024. PMID: 37793947 Review.
References
-
- Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(10):2575-2586. - PubMed
-
- Mather M, Scommenga P, Kilduff L. Fact sheet: Aging in the United States. Population Reference Bureau web site. 2019. (Accessed August 20, 2019). Available at https://www.prb.org/aging-unitedstates-fact-sheet/
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources