Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Aug;67(8):e13781.
doi: 10.1111/myc.13781.

Revision of antifungal strategies definitions for invasive fungal infections (proven/probable/possible) in 461 patients with haematological malignancies (REDEFI-SEIFEM)

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Revision of antifungal strategies definitions for invasive fungal infections (proven/probable/possible) in 461 patients with haematological malignancies (REDEFI-SEIFEM)

Criscuolo Marianna et al. Mycoses. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with haematological neoplasms (HMs). Since 2002, a classification of IFI based on host factors, clinical and radiological features and mycological tests was published for research purpose.

Objectives: These criteria are widely used in clinical practice to identify patients at risk for IFI. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical applicability of EORTC/MSG 2008 criteria for the diagnosis of IFI in daily practice.

Patients/methods: This multicentre, non-interventional, observational, prospective study gathered all consecutive inpatients with HMs in which an intravenous antifungal treatment was started. Exclusion criteria were a previous or concomitant transplant procedure, outpatient status and oral antifungal therapy. EORTC/MSG 2008 criteria were used to classify patients at the beginning of antifungal therapy and at 30 days. An independent board reviewed the classification of IFI given by local clinicians at T0 and T30.

Results: The highest percentage of agreement was found for possible IFI (96%), while a lower agreement was reported for proven IFI (74%), and the highest variability was observed for probable IFI (56%). At T30, the board re-evaluation confirmed a strict agreement for possible IFI only (98%). Among 306 patients classified as possible, 156 (51%) patients showed non-typical radiological findings and 45 (15%) patients presented host factors only.

Conclusions: In real life, the EORTC/MSG criteria can be applicable only for possible IFI. As non-typical radiological findings are reported in possible IFI, introducing a new IFI category should be considered.

Keywords: antifungal therapy; haematological neoplasms; invasive fungal infections; possible IFI; probable IFI; proven IFI.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Reuter S, Kern W, Zenz C, Kern P. Prognostic factors for invasive aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancies. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(6–7):483‐490.
    1. Pagano L, Caira M, Candoni A, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a SEIFEM‐2008 registry study. Haematologica. 2010;95(4):644‐650.
    1. Person AK, Kontoyiannis DP, Alexander BD. Fungal infections in transplant and oncology patients. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2010;24:439‐459.
    1. Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan‐Akdagli S, et al. Diagnosis and management of aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID‐ECMM‐ERS guideline. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:e1‐e38.
    1. Dodds‐Ashley E. Management of drug and food interactions with azole antifungal agents in transplant recipients. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30(8):842‐854. doi:10.1592/phco.30.8.842

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources