This is a preprint.
Personalized Fluid Management in Patients with Sepsis and AKI: A Policy Tree Approach
- PMID: 39148835
- PMCID: PMC11326317
- DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.06.24311556
Personalized Fluid Management in Patients with Sepsis and AKI: A Policy Tree Approach
Abstract
Rationale: Intravenous fluids are mainstay of management of acute kidney injury (AKI) after sepsis but can cause fluid overload. Recent literature shows that restrictive fluid strategy may be beneficial in some patients with AKI, however, identifying these patients is challenging.
Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning algorithm to identify patients who would benefit from a restrictive fluid strategy.
Methods: We included patients with sepsis who developed AKI within 48 hours of ICU admission and defined restrictive fluid strategy as receiving <500mL fluids within 24 hours after AKI. Our primary outcome was early AKI reversal at 24 hours of AKI onset, and secondary outcomes included sustained AKI reversal and major adverse kidney events by 30 days (MAKE30). We used a causal forest, a machine learning algorithm to estimate individual treatment effects and policy tree algorithm to identify patients who would benefit by restrictive fluid strategy. We developed the algorithm in MIMIC-IV and validated it in SICdb databases.
Measurements and main results: Among 2,044 patients in the external validation cohort, policy tree recommended restrictive fluids for 66.7%. Among these, patients who received restrictive fluids demonstrated significantly higher rate of early AKI reversal (47.1% vs 31.7%,p=0.004), sustained AKI reversal (28.7% vs 17.5%, p=0.013) and lower rates of MAKE30 (23.0% vs 37.1%, p=0.011). These results were consistent in adjusted analysis.
Conclusion: Policy tree based on causal machine learning can identify septic patients with AKI who benefit from a restrictive fluid strategy. This approach needs to be validated in prospective trials.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of Chloride-liberal versus Chloriderestrictive Intravenous Fluids among Patients Hospitalized in the United States.J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2016 Apr 7;4(1):90-102. doi: 10.36469/9829. eCollection 2016. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2016. PMID: 34414248 Free PMC article.
-
Restrictive resuscitation in patients with sepsis and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Feb;43(2):104-114. doi: 10.1002/phar.2764. Epub 2023 Jan 21. Pharmacotherapy. 2023. PMID: 36625778 Free PMC article.
-
Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Persistent Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Development and Validation Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e62932. doi: 10.2196/62932. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40200699 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of restrictive fluid resuscitation on severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e086367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086367. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39956601 Free PMC article.
-
Early recovery status and outcomes after sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 May 28;47(5):535-545. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210368. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022. PMID: 35753723 Free PMC article.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources