Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;16(2):9.
doi: 10.54656/jces.v16i2.484. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

Engaging Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) Communities for Health Research: Building and Sustaining PRIDEnet

Engaging Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) Communities for Health Research: Building and Sustaining PRIDEnet

Juno Obedin-Maliver et al. J Community Engagem Scholarsh. 2024.

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, aromantic, and other sexual and/or gender minority (LGBTQIA+) communities are underrepresented in health research and subject to documented health disparities. In addition, LGBTQIA+ communities have experienced mistreatment, discrimination, and stigma in health care and health research settings. Effectively engaging LGBTQIA+ communities and individuals in health research is critical to developing representative data sets, improving health care provision and policy, and reducing disparities. However, little is known about what engagement approaches work well with LGBTQIA+ people. This paper describes the development of PRIDEnet (pridenet.org), a national network dedicated to catalyzing LGBTQIA+ community involvement in health research and built upon well-established community-engaged research (CEnR) principles. PRIDEnet's relationship building and digital communications activities engage thousands of LGBTQIA+-identified people across the country and offer multiple low-threshold ways to participate in specific studies and shape research. These activities comprise a CEnR infrastructure that engages LGBTQIA+ people on behalf of other projects, primarily The PRIDE Study (pridestudy.org) and the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program (joinallofus.org/lgbtqia). Our impact, results, and lessons learned apply to those engaging communities underserved in biomedical research and include: the importance of building adaptable infrastructure that sustains transformational relationships long-term; implementing high-touch activities to establish trust and broad-reach activities to build large data sets; nurturing a team of diverse professionals with lived experiences that reflect those of the communities to be engaged; and maintaining CEnR mechanisms that exceed advice-giving and result in substantive research contributions from beginning to end.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures MRL consulted for Hims, Incorporated (2019–present), Folx, Incorporated (2019–2020) Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Incorporated (2023), and the American Dental Association (2024). JOM has consulted for Sage Therapeutics (2017), Ibis Reproductive Health (2017–2018, 2020–present), Hims, Incorporated (2019–present), Folx, Incorporated (2019–present) and Upstream, Incoporated (2024). None of these engagements influenced or are pertinent to the work described in this manuscript. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRIDEnet Structure. PRIDEnet has two central bodies: PRIDEnet Advisory Committee (PAC) and PRIDEnet / PRIDE Study Research Advisory Committee (RAC). The PAC with PRIDEnet staff engages PRIDEnet Community Partner Consortium Members (here “Partners”) and are in close collaboration with the RAC. The RAC and PRIDEnet staff are primarily responsible for engagement with SGM health researchers and compliance with research guidelines and regulations. The PAC and RAC have open communication channels bridged by PRIDEnet staff. Communication and collaboration among Partners and Researchers will be encouraged and facilitated. Please note, as with any model there are limitations in representation and there are for example individuals who represent “Partners” who are researchers and “Researchers” among partners.

References

    1. American Civil Liberties Union (2024, March). Mapping Attacks on LGBTQ Rights in U.S. State Legislatures in 2024. Retrieved March 7, 2024, from https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights-2024
    1. Balls-Berry JE, & Acosta-Pérez E. (2017). The use of community engaged research principles to improve health: Community academic partnerships for research. Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal, 36(2), 84–85. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582944/ - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer GR (2014). Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Social Science & Medicine, 110, 10–17. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brandt JS, Eichelberger KY, & Wong MS (2022). Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Commitment to excellence in obstetrical care, research, and education for people with diverse sexual and gender identities. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 226(4), B10–B12. 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1344 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown J, & Maulbeck BF (2015, January 26). Vital funding: Investing in LGBTQ health and wellbeing. Funders for LGBTQ Issues. https://lgbtfunders.org/research-item/vital-funding-part-one/

LinkOut - more resources