Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 17;14(1):19090.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70055-9.

Multimodal MRI-based deep-radiomics model predicts response in cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Affiliations

Multimodal MRI-based deep-radiomics model predicts response in cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Zhihua Cai et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical hysterectomy has been proposed as an alternative treatment approach for cervical cancer (CC) in stage Ib2-IIb, who had a strong desire to be treated with surgery. Our study aims to develop a model based on multimodal MRI by using radiomics and deep learning to predict the treatment response in CC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). From August 2009 to June 2013, CC patients in stage Ib2-IIb (FIGO 2008) who received NACRT at Fujian Cancer Hospital were enrolled in our study. Clinical information, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI), and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) data were respectively collected. Radiomic features and deep abstract features were extracted from the images using radiomics and deep learning models, respectively. Then, ElasticNet and SVM-RFE were employed for feature selection to construct four single-sequence feature sets. Early fusion of two multi-sequence feature sets and one hybrid feature set were performed, followed by classification prediction using four machine learning classifiers. Subsequently, the performance of the models in predicting the response to NACRT was evaluated by separating patients into training and validation sets. Additionally, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Among the four machine learning models, SVM exhibited the best predictive performance (AUC=0.86). Among the seven feature sets, the hybrid feature set achieved the highest values for AUC (0.86), ACC (0.75), Recall (0.75), Precision (0.81), and F1-score (0.75) in the validation set, outperforming other feature sets. Furthermore, the predicted outcomes of the model were closely associated with patient OS and DFS (p = 0.0044; p = 0.0039). A model based on MRI images with features from multiple sequences and different methods could precisely predict the response to NACRT in CC patients. This model could assist clinicians in devising personalized treatment plans and predicting patient survival outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The predictive performance of different feature sets in the validation set is assessed through confusion matrices and ROC curves.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The predictive performance of different feature sets in the validation set is assessed through confusion matrices and ROC curves.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of ROC curves for all models. The left graph is the results from the training set and the right graph is the results from the validation set.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Nomogram for predicting response to NACRT in CC.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Nomogram for predicting 3-year and 5-year OS in CC patients based on age, FIGO stage, tumor size, and radiomics score.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The left graph represents OS, while the right graph represents DFS.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Flowchart of the study enrolment patients.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Grad-CAM visualization demonstrates that the deep model pays more attention to the edge features of tumor images.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Feature selection block.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The research design and process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin.71, 209–249 (2021). 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ward, Z. J. et al. The role and contribution of treatment and imaging modalities in global cervical cancer management: Survival estimates from a simulation-based analysis. Lancet Oncol.21, 1089–1098 (2020). 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30316-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatla, N., Aoki, D., Sharma, D. N. & Sankaranarayanan, R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstetr.143, 22–36 (2018).10.1002/ijgo.12611 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koh, W.-J. et al. Cervical cancer, version 2.2015. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw.13, 395–404 (2015).10.6004/jnccn.2015.0055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santoni, M. et al. Complete remissions following immunotherapy or immuno-oncology combinations in cancer patients: The mouseion-03 meta-analysis. Cancer Immunol. Immunother.72, 1365–1379 (2023). 10.1007/s00262-022-03349-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed