High scientific value of consensus is based on appropriate and rigorous methodology: The ESSKA formal consensus methodology
- PMID: 39154255
- DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12390
High scientific value of consensus is based on appropriate and rigorous methodology: The ESSKA formal consensus methodology
References
REFERENCES
-
- Beaufils, P., Becker, R., Kopf, S., Englund, M., Verdonk, R., Ollivier, M. et al. (2017) Surgical management of degenerative meniscus lesions: the 2016 ESSKA meniscus consensus. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25(2), 335–346. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4407-4
-
- Beaufils, P., Dejour, D., Filardo, G., Monllau, J.C., Menetrey, J., Seil, R. et al. (2023) ESSKA consensus initiative: why, when and how? Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 10(1), 101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00664-2
-
- Blazey, P., Crossley, K.M., Ardern, C.L., van Middelkoop, M., Scott, A. & Khan, K.M. (2022) It is time for consensus on ‘consensus statements’. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56(6), 306–307. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104578
-
- Condello, V., Beaufilis, P., Becker, R., Ahmad, S.S., Bonomo, M., Dejour, D. et al. (2023) Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus: part II‐surgical strategy. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 31(11), 4652–4661. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07550-5
-
- Dalkey, N.C., Brown, B.B. & Cochran, S. (1969) The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion, 3 California: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
