Utility of epitope-specific IgE, IgG4, and IgG1 antibodies for the diagnosis of wheat allergy
- PMID: 39154658
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.08.003
Utility of epitope-specific IgE, IgG4, and IgG1 antibodies for the diagnosis of wheat allergy
Abstract
Background: The bead-based epitope assay has been used to identify epitope-specific (es) antibodies and successfully used to diagnose clinical allergy to milk, egg, and peanut.
Objective: We sought to identify es-IgE, es-IgG4, and es-IgG1 of wheat proteins and determine the optimal peptides to differentiate wheat-allergic from wheat-tolerant using the bead-based epitope assay.
Methods: Children and adolescents who underwent an oral food challenge to confirm their wheat allergy status were enrolled. Seventy-nine peptides from α-/β-gliadin, γ-gliadin, ω-5-gliadin, and high- and low-molecular-weight glutenin were commercially synthesized and coupled to LumAvidin beads (Luminex Corporation, Austin, Tex). Machine learning methods were used to identify diagnostic epitopes, and performance was evaluated using the DeLong test.
Results: The analysis included 122 children (83 wheat-allergic and 39 wheat-tolerant; 57.4% male). Machine learning coupled with simulations identified wheat es-IgE, but not es-IgG4 or es-IgG1, to be the most informative for diagnosing wheat allergy. Higher es-IgE binding intensity correlated with the severity of allergy phenotypes, with wheat anaphylaxis exhibiting the highest es-IgE binding intensity. In contrast, wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis showed lower es-IgG1 binding intensity than did all the other groups. A set of 4 informative epitopes from ω-5-gliadin and γ-gliadin were the best predictors of wheat allergy, with an area under the curve of 0.908 (sensitivity, 83.4%; specificity, 88.4%), higher than the performance exhibited by wheat-specific IgE (area under the curve = 0.646; P < .001). The predictive ability of our model was confirmed in an external cohort of 71 patients (29 allergic, 42 nonallergic), with an area under the curve of 0.908 (sensitivity, 75.9%; specificity, 90.5%).
Conclusions: The wheat bead-based epitope assay demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy compared with existing specific IgE tests for wheat allergy.
Keywords: Bead-based epitope assay; children; diagnostic test; sequential epitope-specific antibodies; wheat allergy.
Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure statement This research project was supported by a grant from the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (grant no. Internal Order [IO] R016232026) and by the David H. and Julia Koch Research Program in Food Allergy Research. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Suárez-Fariñas reports consultancy feeds from DBV Technologies. M. Suprun is currently an employee at Janssen Pharmaceutical. H. A. Sampson reports funding to his institution for grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; has received consulting fees from DBV Technologies, N-Fold Therapeutics, LLC, and Siolta, Inc; and has received stock options from DBV Technologies and N-Fold Therapeutics, LLC. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
