Severity and organ distribution of graft-versus-host disease with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate/mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus in allogenic HLA-matched or single-allele mismatched stem cell transplantation
- PMID: 39155459
- DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14294
Severity and organ distribution of graft-versus-host disease with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate/mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus in allogenic HLA-matched or single-allele mismatched stem cell transplantation
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective single center study aims to describe changes in the severity and organ-specific distribution of GvHD, by comparing the outcomes of 3 distinct GvHD prophylaxis approaches.
Methods: Between January 2012 and June 2022, 226 patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched or 1-allele mismatched related or unrelated donors. Fifty-eight (26%) received prophylaxis with calcineurin inhibitor in combination with mycophenolate mofetil or a short course of methotrexate (Cohort-1), 87 (38%) tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Cohort-2), and 81 (36%) post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) plus tacrolimus (Cohort-3).
Results: The incidence of grade II-IV aGvHD was 69% vs. 41.4% vs. 27.2%; p < .01. The most significant reduction with PTCy was observed in both stage 3-4 skin and lower gastrointestinal (GI) involvement (p < .01). The incidence of moderate-to-severe cGvHD at 12 months was 34.5% vs. 34.5% vs. 6.2%; p < .01. Moderate-to-severe skin and GI cGvHD was less common after PTCy (p < .01). The 1-year GvHD-free/relapse-free survival was higher with PTCy (p < .01).
Conclusions: Our study indicates that PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis reduces the frequency and severity of both acute and chronic GvHD, with a notable decrease in severe GI and cutaneous manifestations. The higher GRFS may result in lower GvHD-related mortality, leading to an improved quality of life among survivors.
Keywords: GvHD; allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant; non‐relapse mortality; post‐transplant cyclophosphamide.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Okamoto S. Current indication for hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017;10(4):178‐183.
-
- Hashmi SK, Lee SJ, Savani BN, et al. ASBMT practice guidelines committee survey on long‐term follow‐up clinics for hematopoietic cell transplant survivors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(6):1119‐1124.
-
- Bruno B, Seguy D, Maunoury V, et al. Improvement of supportive care in patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation not only reduces transplant‐related mortality but also increases long‐term survival. Blood. 2008;112(11):4318.
-
- Penack O, Peczynski C, Mohty M, et al. How much has allogeneic stem cell transplant‐related mortality improved since the 1980s? A retrospective analysis from the EBMT. Blood Adv. 2020;4(24):6283‐6290.
-
- Styczyński J, Tridello G, Koster L, et al. Death after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: changes over calendar year time, infections and associated factors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55(1):126‐136.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials