Social vulnerability and prenatal diagnosis
- PMID: 39155568
- DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0177
Social vulnerability and prenatal diagnosis
Abstract
Objectives: There are limited data on how neighborhood-level risk factors affect the likelihood of having prenatal diagnosis. Neighborhood social vulnerability can be quantified and ranked using the social vulnerability index (SVI), a tool that measures the cumulative effect of external stressors in the local environment that may affect health outcomes. The objective of the study was to determine the relationship between SVI and prenatal diagnosis among pregnant patients who received genetic counseling.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study of all pregnant patients who had genetic counseling at two hospitals in New York between January 2019 and December 2022. For each patient, the address of residence was linked to an SVI score (primary exposure) based on census tract. SVI scores were subdivided into fifths and analyzed categorically. The primary outcome was prenatal diagnosis (yes/no). Multivariable logistic regression was performed.
Results: A total of 5,935 patients were included for analysis and 231 (3.9 %) had prenatal diagnosis. On regression analysis, no association between SVI and prenatal diagnosis was observed. Patients who had a diagnostic procedure were more likely to be English speaking (aOR 1.80; 95 % CI 1.13-2.87), carriers of a genetic disorder (aOR 1.94; 95 % CI 1.32-2.86), had increased NT (aOR 6.89; 95 % CI 3.65-13.00), abnormal NIPS (aOR 9.58; 95 % CI 5.81-15.80), or had fetal structural anomalies (aOR 10.60; 95 % CI 6.62-16.96). No differences were seen based on race and ethnicity group, insurance type, or marital status.
Conclusions: SVI score does not affect rate of prenatal diagnosis. Findings may differ in other geographic regions and populations.
Keywords: amniocentesis; chorionic villi sampling; genetic counseling; prenatal diagnosis; social vulnerability index.
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Similar articles
-
Social Vulnerability Index and Surgical Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Reproductive-age Women.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1104-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35691547
-
Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated with Maternal Comorbidity Burden and Social Vulnerability.Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e3333-e3340. doi: 10.1055/a-2223-3602. Epub 2023 Dec 6. Am J Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 38057088
-
Association between Individual versus Community-level Social Vulnerability and Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome among Pregnant Individuals Receiving Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder.Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e3157-e3163. doi: 10.1055/a-2200-3187. Epub 2023 Oct 27. Am J Perinatol. 2024. PMID: 37890511
-
Prenatal diagnosis of congenital myotonic dystrophy and counseling of the pregnant mother: case report and literature review.Am J Med Genet. 1998 Jul 7;78(3):250-3. Am J Med Genet. 1998. PMID: 9677060 Review.
-
Prenatal diagnosis: choices women make about pursuing testing and acting on abnormal results.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;36(3):496-509. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199309000-00008. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8403601 Review.
References
-
- Practice Bulletin No . 162: prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:e108–22.
-
- Edwards, L, Hui, L. First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;23:102–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005 . - DOI
-
- Warton, C, Johnston, M, Mills, C. Reproductive deliberation: supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel 2023;32:576–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1682 . - DOI
-
- Christopher, D, Fringuello, M, Fought, AJ, Bolt, M, Micke, K, Elfman, H, et al.. Evaluating for disparities in prenatal genetic counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022;4:100494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100494 . - DOI
-
- Wong, AE, Dungan, J, Feinglass, J, Grobman, WA. Socioeconomic disparities in diagnostic testing after positive aneuploidy screening. Am J Perinatol 2015;30:205–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1381320 . - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials