Resources on lymphedema surgery: How effective are they for patients?
- PMID: 39155682
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.27783
Resources on lymphedema surgery: How effective are they for patients?
Abstract
Online patient education materials (PEMs) on lymphedema surgery were assessed for quality, readability, and content. A total of 37 PEMs were identified, primarily authored by academic/medical organizations. Readability scores indicated materials were difficult to read, with an average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 10.4. PEM Assessment Tools showed acceptable understandability (72.3%) but poor actionability (28.5%). PEMs often lacked information on surgical risks, postoperative care, and long-term follow-up. Simplifying language and adding visual aids could improve PEM effectiveness.
Keywords: assessment tool; lymphedema; patient education; plastic surgery.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Brouillard P, Witte MH, Erickson RP, et al. Primary lymphoedema. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):77.
-
- Grada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(6):1009‐1020.
-
- Lasinski BB. Complete decongestive therapy for treatment of lymphedema. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2013;29(1):20‐27.
-
- Senger JLB, Kadle RL, Skoracki RJ. Current concepts in the management of primary lymphedema. Medicina. 2023;59(5):894. doi:10.3390/medicina59050894
-
- Schaverien MV, Coroneos CJ. Surgical treatment of lymphedema. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2019;144(3):738‐758.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
