Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Aug 2:37:13030.
doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.13030. eCollection 2024.

Prophylactic Peri-Nephric Drain Placement in Renal Transplant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prophylactic Peri-Nephric Drain Placement in Renal Transplant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adil S Lakha et al. Transpl Int. .

Abstract

Renal transplantation is common worldwide, with >25,000 procedures performed in 2022. Usage of prophylactic perinephric drains is variable in renal transplantation; drains are associated with risks, and there is a lack of consensus regarding benefit of routine drain placement in these patients. This meta-analysis assessed whether prophylactic drainage reduced need for reintervention postoperatively. This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, and prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Summary statistics for outcomes of interest underwent meta-analyses to a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and are presented as Forest Plots for Odds Ratio (OR). A systematic literature search in June 2023 revealed 1,540 unique articles across four databases. Of these, four retrospective cohort studies were selected. Meta-analysis of three studies showed no significant reduction in reintervention rate with pre-emptive drain placement, OR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.16-2.23), p = 0.44. Meta-analysis did not show a significant reduction in perinephric collections with prophylactic drain insertion OR = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.13-2.37), p = 0.42. Finally, there is not good evidence that drain placement reduces superficial wound complications or improves 12-month graft survival. Further work is needed, including well-designed, prospective studies to assess the risks and benefits of drain placement in these patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023422685, Identifier PROSPERO CRD42021255795.

Keywords: collection; drain; perinephric drain; prophylactic drainage; renal transplant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Meta-analysis of reintervention rate.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Meta-analysis of deep wound complications.

References

    1. Zawistowski M, Nowaczyk J, Domagała P. Prophylactic Intra-Abdominal Drainage Following Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pol Przegl Chir (2021) 93(4):1–10. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.9166 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Derweesh IH, Ismail HR, Goldfarb DA, Araki M, Zhou L, Modlin C, et al. Intraoperative Placing of Drains Decreases the Incidence of Lymphocele and Deep Vein Thrombosis After Renal Transplantation. BJU Int (2008) 101(11):1415–9. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07427.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Findik UY, Topcu SY, Vatansever O. Effects of Draıns on Pain, Comfort and Anxiety in Patıents Undergone Surgery. Int J Caring Sci (2013) 6(3).
    1. Mujagic E, Zeindler J, Coslovsky M, Hoffmann H, Soysal SD, Mechera R, et al. The Association of Surgical Drains With Surgical Site Infections - A Prospective Observational Study. Am J Surg (2019) 217(1):17–23. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong CS, Cousins G, Duddy JC, Walsh SR. Intra-Abdominal Drainage for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Surg (2015) 23:87–96. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.033 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources