Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 2:11:1419147.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1419147. eCollection 2024.

Rapid campimetry - a novel robust kinetic approach for visual field screening in glaucoma

Affiliations

Rapid campimetry - a novel robust kinetic approach for visual field screening in glaucoma

Khaldoon O Al-Nosairy et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the robustness and variability of a novel kinetic visual field (VF) screening method termed rapid campimetry (RC).

Methods: In RC visual field (VF) screening is enabled via kinetic-based testing on any computer (10°/4.7 s at 40-cm viewing distance) and high contrast in a dark room (1 cd/cm2). In experiment (1): 30 participants [20 healthy participants (HC), 5 glaucoma patients (GLA) and 5 patients with cataract (CAT)] were included to test the intra-session variability (fatigue effect) and the following effects on RC: room illumination (140 cd/m2), ±3 D refractive errors, media opacity. In experiment (2): Inter-session variability (1-3 weeks apart) was assessed in 10 HC and 10 GLA. Since RC detects absolute scotomas, the outcome measure was the size of physiological (blindspot) and pathological (glaucoma) scotomas in degrees. A repeated measures ANOVA was employed in experiment 1 and intraclass correlation (ICC) in experiment 2.

Results: Neither the size of the blindspot nor the VF defects differed significantly between the different testing conditions. For intra-session variability, the average bias of blindspot size was -0.6 ± 2.5°, limits of agreement (LOA), in comparison to 0.3 ± 1.5° for VF defects, both with ICC of 0.86 and 0.93, respectively. For the inter-session repeatability, the average bias and LOA for blindspot size was 0.2 ± 3.85° in comparison 1.6 ± 3.1° for VF defects, both with ICC of 0.87 and 0.91, respectively.

Conclusion: RC was robust to suboptimal testing VF conditions and showed good-to-excellent reliability between VF testing visits holding high potential for teleophthalmology.

Keywords: confounding VF factors; glaucoma; rapid campimetry; teleophthalmology; visual field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FM received no support for the present manuscript, but he got funds for patenting the method “Rapid Campimetry” with H & M Medical Solutions GmbH by WIPANO, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz, Projektträger Jülich (PtJ), 353 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH. There was no rule of the funders in planning, conducting, analysis or reporting the current study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Illustration of trajectory of the test point. The test point trajectories are indicated for campimetry testing of the right eye as a dashed line (not shown during testing). The red circle denotes the start position of test spot which subsequently travels along the dashed line; the blindspot is indicated as a black disk not shown during testing. Participants are instructed to fixate the central cross during testing.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of blindspot and glaucoma-induced VF-defect size in different conditions using RM-ANOVA: (A) the size of blind spot differences across groups and conditions and (B) the size of visual field (VF) defect in glaucoma group. For abbreviations see Table 1.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Intrasession and intersession variability of the standard rapid campimetry tests (TST): Subplot (i) on the same day and subplot (ii) on different days, 1–3 weeks apart. (A,B) Correlation plots for blindspot’s size. Bland-Altman plots for (C,D) blindspot’s size reproducibility and (E,F) VF defects’ size reproducibility.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tham Y, Li X, Wong T, Quigley H, Aung T, Cheng C. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. (2014) 121:2081–90. - PubMed
    1. Chauhan B, Garway-Heath D, Goñi F, Rossetti L, Bengtsson B, Viswanathan A, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. (2008) 92:569–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turpin A, Jankovic D, McKendrick A. Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2007) 48:1627–34. 10.1167/iovs.06-1074 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Müller F, Al-Nosairy K, Kramer F, Meltendorf C, Djouoma N, Thieme H, et al. Rapid campimetry—A novel screening method for glaucoma diagnosis. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:2156. 10.3390/jcm11082156 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hood D, Raza A, de Moraes C, Liebmann J, Ritch R. Glaucomatous damage of the macula. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2013) 32:1–21. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources