Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 6;5(8):776-782.
doi: 10.1002/bco2.389. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Trans-rectovesical pouch urethral-sparing robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: A case series

Affiliations

Trans-rectovesical pouch urethral-sparing robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: A case series

Xinnan Chen et al. BJUI Compass. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 30;5(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.1002/bco2.482. eCollection 2024 Dec. BJUI Compass. 2024. PMID: 39744071 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Objective: To detail a novel technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy that makes handling the gland protruding into the bladder neck easier and can preserve the urethra and retain ejaculation function as much as possible.

Patients and methods: This is a prospective case series. Clinical data of 17 male patients who had large volume (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were enrolled to undergo trans-rectovesical pouch urethral-sparing robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (usRASP). We adopted the approach through the space between the bladder neck and seminal vesicle to perform a usRASP that can avoid the detrusor skirt and fibrous matrix area of the retropubic prostate. Between the transitional zone and the peripheral zone of the large prostate, the hyperplastic prostatic gland tissue can be enucleated under direct vision while preserving the prostatic urethra and retaining the ejaculatory duct and bladder neck intact. All preoperative, perioperative and postoperative clinical data were collected, and descriptive analysis was performed.

Results: The median intravesical prostatic protrusion was 19.3 mm (8.5-32.2). The median operative time was 100 min (75-140), and the median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (10-500). The median time to catheter removal was 7 days (5-7), with a median postoperative hospital stay of 2 days (2-4). After at least 6-month follow-up, the median maximum urine flow rate and postvoid residual volume were 40.1 mL/s (12.7-52.4) and 15 mL (5-23), respectively; the median International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life score were 0 (0-6.3) and 1 (0-3), respectively; and the median total prostate-specific antigen was 0.84 ng/mL (0.15-1.01). All patients successfully underwent usRASP. Fifty-eight percent of patients with normal ejaculation function before surgery can still retain normal ejaculation function.

Conclusion: We described a new approach to performing usRASP. This new method remarkably improved the voiding function, maintained antegrade ejaculation and did not increase the post-operative complications.

Keywords: ejaculation function; large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia; trans‐rectovesical pouch; urethral‐sparing robotic‐assisted simple prostatectomy; urethtal‐sparing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the contributing authors have any conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Key steps of trans‐rectovesical pouch urethral‐sparing robotic‐assisted simple prostatectomy. (A) A shallow disc‐shaped incision of the peritoneum of the vesicorectal fossa revealed the prostatic capsule above the seminal vesicle and ejaculatory ducts. (B) A crescent‐shaped transverse incision was made on the prostate capsule. (C) The apex urethra (the area from 3 to 9 o'clock), about 1 cm long, was freed from the apex gland. ED, ejaculatory duct. (D) The bladder neck and the connected prostatic urethra (the area from 1 to 11 o'clock) were freed from the proliferative glands and the middle lobe. PU, prostatic urethra. (E) The left lobe was removed from the prostatic urethra. PU, prostatic urethra. (F) Anterior fibrostromal areas were preserved. (G) The prostatic urethral integrity was tested for any leakage. PU, prostatic urethra.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in sagittal plane of the prostate for the same patient before the operation (A) and 1 year after operation (B).

References

    1. Langan RC. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prim Care. 2019;46:223–232. - PubMed
    1. Moschovas MC, Timoteo F, Lins L, de Castro NO, Seetharam BK, Patel VR. Robotic surgery techniques to approach benign prostatic hyperplasia disease: a comprehensive literature review and the state of art. Asian J Urol. 2021;8:81–88. 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.10.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Couteau N, Duquesne I, Frederic P, et al. Ejaculations and benign prostatic hyperplasia: an impossible compromise? A Comprehen Rev J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5788. 10.3390/jcm10245788 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sibona M, Destefanis P, Vercelli E, Secco S, Gontero P, Cindolo L. Ejaculation physiology and dysfunction after BPH surgery: the role of the new MISTs. Prostate Cancer P D. 2023;26:475–482. - PubMed
    1. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Niculescu G, Volpi G, Piramide F, et al. Urethral‐sparing robot‐assisted simple prostatectomy: an innovative technique to preserve ejaculatory function overcoming the limitation of the standard Millin approach. Eur Urol. 2021;80(2):222–233. 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.028 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources