ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSINGS FOR FULL-THICKNESS INFECTED BURN WOUNDS
- PMID: 39158545
- DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002426
ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSINGS FOR FULL-THICKNESS INFECTED BURN WOUNDS
Abstract
Infection of wounds delays healing, increases treatment costs, and leads to major complications. Current methods to manage such infections include antibiotic ointments and antimicrobial wound dressings, both of which have significant drawbacks, including frequent reapplication and contribution to antimicrobial resistance. In this work, we developed wound dressings fabricated with a medical-grade polyurethane coating composed of natural plant secondary metabolites, cinnamaldehyde, and alpha-terpineol. Our wound dressings are easy to change and do not adhere to the wound bed. They kill gram-positive and -negative microbes in infected wounds due to the Food and Drug Administration-approved for human consumption components. The wound dressings were fabricated by dip coating. Antimicrobial efficacy was determined by quantifying the bacteria colonies after a 24 h of immersion. Wound healing and bacterial reduction were assessed in an in vivo full-thickness porcine burn model. Our antimicrobial wound dressings showed a > 5-log reduction (99.999%) of different gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, while maintaining absorbency. In the in vivo porcine burn model, our wound dressings were superior to bacitracin in decreasing bacterial burden during daily changes, without interfering with wound healing. Additionally, the dressings had a significantly lower adhesion to the wound bed. Our antimicrobial wound dressings reduced the burden of clinically relevant bacteria more than commercial antimicrobial wound dressings. In an in vivo infected burn wound model, our coatings performed as well or better than bacitracin. We anticipate that our wound dressings would be useful for the treatment of various types of acute and chronic wounds.
Copyright © 2024 by the Shock Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Sen CK, Roy S, Gordillo G: Wound healing. In: Plastic Surgery . 4th ed. vol. 1: Principles. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017:165–195.
-
- Steiner CA, Karaca Z, Moore BJ, et al. Surgeries in Hospital-Based Ambulatory Surgery and Hospital Inpatient Settings, 2014. 2017 May [Updated 2020 Jul 20]. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006. Statistical Brief #223. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442035/ . Accessed September 11, 2024.
-
- Sen CK. Human wounds and its burden: an updated compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care . 2019;8(2):39–48.
-
- Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Bjarnsholt T, et al. Antimicrobials and non-healing wounds. Evidence, controversies and suggestions—key messages. J Wound Care . 2014;23(10):477–482.
-
- Percival SL. Importance of biofilm formation in surgical infection. Br J Surg . 2017;104(2):e85–e94.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
