Robotic-assisted extended thymectomy for large resectable thymoma: 21 years' experience
- PMID: 39159885
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.08.005
Robotic-assisted extended thymectomy for large resectable thymoma: 21 years' experience
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and midterm oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery extended thymectomy for patients with large resectable thymomas compared with small thymomas.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 204 patients with thymomas who underwent robotic-assisted thoracic surgery extended thymectomy between January 2003 and February 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the thymoma size (5-cm threshold).
Results: The study comprised 114 patients (55.9%) in the small thymoma group and 90 patients (44.1%) in the large thymoma group. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding gender, age, proportion of elderly patients, or pathologic high-risk classifications. Apart from a longer operative time (P = .009) in the large thymoma group, no differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding surgical parameters and postoperative outcomes. No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group. During a median follow-up of 61.0 months (95% CI, 48.96-73.04), 4 patients experienced recurrence (1.96%). No significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (P = .25) or recurrence-free survival (P = .43) were observed between groups.
Conclusions: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery extended thymectomy is technically feasible, safe, and effective for treating large resectable thymomas. Moreover, midterm outcomes for patients with completely resected large thymomas were comparable to those with small thymomas during a median follow-up period of up to 5 years.
Keywords: large resectable thymoma; oncological outcomes; robotic-assisted; thymectomy; tumor size.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement Drs Rueckert and Elsner are the proctors for Intuitive Surgical. Dr Meisel is the chairman of the medical advisory board of the German Myasthenia Gravis Society. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
