Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep;38(9):4869-4879.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11130-0. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

Artificial intelligence-aided ultrasound imaging in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: where are we now?

Affiliations
Review

Artificial intelligence-aided ultrasound imaging in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: where are we now?

Mustafa Bektaş et al. Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) models have been applied in various medical imaging modalities and surgical disciplines, however the current status and progress of ultrasound-based AI models within hepatopancreatobiliary surgery have not been evaluated in literature. Therefore, this review aimed to provide an overview of ultrasound-based AI models used for hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, evaluating current advancements, validation, and predictive accuracies.

Method: Databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies using AI models on ultrasound for patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. To be eligible for inclusion, studies needed to apply AI methods on ultrasound imaging for patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. The Probast risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of AI methods.

Results: AI models have been primarily used within hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, to predict tumor recurrence, differentiate between tumoral tissues, and identify lesions during ultrasound imaging. Most studies have combined radiomics with convolutional neural networks, with AUCs up to 0.98.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-based AI models have demonstrated promising accuracies in predicting early tumoral recurrence and even differentiating between tumoral tissue types during and after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. However, prospective studies are required to evaluate if these results will remain consistent and externally valid.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Mustafa Bektaş, Catherine Chia, George Burchell, Freek Daams, and professors Jaap Bonjer and Donald van der Peet have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart of the search strategy and study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Common workflow of AI models observed within the included studies

Similar articles

References

    1. Machi J, Sigel B, Zaren HA, Kurohiji T, Yamashita Y (1993) Operative ultrasonography during hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. World J Surg 17(5):640–646 10.1007/BF01659130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montoya J, Stawicki SP, Evans DC, Bahner DP, Sparks S, Sharpe RP et al (2016) From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasound-based traumatic injury assessment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42(2):119–126 10.1007/s00068-015-0512-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sooklal S, Chahal P (2020) Endoscopic ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 100(6):1133–1150 10.1016/j.suc.2020.07.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smereczyński A, Kołaczyk K (2018) Pitfalls in ultrasound imaging of the stomach and the intestines. J Ultrason 18(74):207–211 10.15557/JoU.2018.0031 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choe J, Wortman JR, Michaels A, Sarma A, Fulwadhva UP, Sodickson AD (2019) Beyond appendicitis: ultrasound findings of acute bowel pathology. Emerg Radiol 26(3):307–317 10.1007/s10140-019-01670-7 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources