The Effect of Time Pressure on Motion Economy and Smoothness of Interventional Radiology Trainee Performance in Simulated Central Venous Line Placement
- PMID: 39160358
- DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03831-9
The Effect of Time Pressure on Motion Economy and Smoothness of Interventional Radiology Trainee Performance in Simulated Central Venous Line Placement
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of being under time pressure on procedural performance using hand motion analysis.
Materials and methods: Eight radiology trainees performed central venous access on a phantom while recording video and hand motion data using an electromagnetic motion tracker. Each trainee performed the procedure six times: the first three trials without any prompts (control), while for the next three, they were asked to perform the task as fast as possible (time pressure). Validated hand motion metrics were analyzed, and two blinded and independent evaluators rated procedural performance using a previously validated task-specific global rating scale (GRS). Motion/time ratios and linear mixed-effect methods were used to control for time, and constants for both strategies were compared.
Results: Hand motion analysis showed that trainees completed the simulated procedure faster under time pressure (46 ± 18 s vs. 56 ± 27 s, p = 0.008) than during the control strategy. However, when controlling for time, trainees moved their hands 79 more centimeters (p = 0.04), made 15 more translational movements (p = 0.003) and 18 more rotational movements (p = 0.01) when under time pressure compared to at their own pace.
Conclusion: Although trainees could perform the procedure faster under time pressure, there was a deterioration in hand motion economy and smoothness. This suggests that hand motion metrics offer a more comprehensive assessment of technical performance than time alone.
Keywords: Global rating scale; Hand motion analysis; Time pressure.
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).
Similar articles
-
Hand Motion Analysis of Different Segments of a Procedure: Is One Segment Enough?J Med Syst. 2025 May 23;49(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02198-9. J Med Syst. 2025. PMID: 40407939
-
Analyzing the Evolution of Needle and Ultrasound Probe Manipulation Skills of Interventional Radiology Trainees With Time and Experience.Simul Healthc. 2025 Feb 1;20(1):16-20. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000808. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Simul Healthc. 2025. PMID: 38922448
-
The development and validation of hand motion analysis to evaluate competency in central line catheterization.Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;22(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12590. Epub 2015 Feb 9. Acad Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25676530
-
Review of Simulation Training in Interventional Radiology.Acad Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(4):529-539. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Dec 6. Acad Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29221857 Review.
-
Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30117156 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Hand Motion Analysis of Different Segments of a Procedure: Is One Segment Enough?J Med Syst. 2025 May 23;49(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02198-9. J Med Syst. 2025. PMID: 40407939
References
-
- Chin KJ, Tse C, Chan V, Tan JS, Lupu CM, Hayter M. Hand motion analysis using the imperial college surgical assessment device: validation of a novel and objective performance measure in ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:213–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4305 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Clinkard D, Holden M, Ungi T, Messenger D, Davison C, Fichtinger G, McGraw R. The development and validation of hand motion analysis to evaluate competency in central line catheterization. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22:212–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12590 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Weinstein JL, Ali H, Sarwar A, Dadour JR, Brook OR, Mitchell JD, Matyal R, Palmer MR, MacLellan C, Ahmed M. evaluation of technical performance of ultrasound-guided procedures through hand motion analysis: an exploration of motion metrics. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023;34:1337–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.05.015 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Weinstein J, El-Gabalawy F, Sarwar A, DeBacker SS, Faintuch S, Berkowitz S, Bulman J, Palmer M, Matyal R, Mahmood F, Ahmed M. Analysis of kinematic differences in hand motion between novice and experienced operators in interventional radiology: a pilot study. J Vasc Int Radiol. 2021;32(2):226–34. - DOI
-
- Ghasemloonia A, Maddahi Y, Zareinia K, Lama S, Dort JC, Sutherland GR. Surgical skill assessment using motion quality and smoothness. J Surg Educ. 2017;74:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.006 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources