Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;48(8):e13490.
doi: 10.1111/cogs.13490.

Partner-Specific Adaptation in Disfluency Processing

Affiliations

Partner-Specific Adaptation in Disfluency Processing

Si On Yoon et al. Cogn Sci. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Speakers tend to produce disfluencies when naming unexpected or complex items; in turn, when perceiving disfluency, listeners tend to expect upcoming reference to items that are unexpected or complex to name. In two experiments, we examined if these disfluency-based expectations are routine, or instead, if they adapt to the way the speaker uses disfluency in the current context in a talker-specific manner. Participants listened to instructions to look at objects in contexts with several images, some of which lacked conventional names. We manipulated the co-occurrence of disfluency and reference to novel versus familiar objects in a single talker situation (Experiment 1) and in a multi-talker situation (Experiment 2). In the predictive condition, disfluent expressions referred to novel objects, and fluent expressions referred to familiar objects. In the nonpredictive condition, fluent and disfluent trials referred to either familiar or novel objects. Participants' gaze revealed that listeners more readily predicted familiar images for fluent trials and novel images for disfluent trials in the predictive condition than in the nonpredictive condition. In sum, listeners adapted their expectations about upcoming words based on recent experience with disfluency. Disfluency is not invariably processed, but instead a cue that is flexibly interpreted depending on the local context even in a multi-talker setting.

Keywords: Adaptation; Eye‐tracking; Partner‐specific processing; Speech disfluency.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arnold, J. E., Hudson Kam, C. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: The on‐line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 914–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278‐7393.33.5.914
    1. Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R., & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 578–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956‐7976.2004.00723.x
    1. Barr, D., & Seyfeddinipur, M. (2010). The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903047122
    1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed‐Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    1. Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in spontaneous speech: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44, 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440020101