Peripheral liver metastases are more frequently missed than central metastases in contrast-enhanced CT: insights from a 25-reader performance study
- PMID: 39162799
- PMCID: PMC11794030
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04520-4
Peripheral liver metastases are more frequently missed than central metastases in contrast-enhanced CT: insights from a 25-reader performance study
Abstract
Purpose: Subtle liver metastases may be missed in contrast enhanced CT imaging. We determined the impact of lesion location and conspicuity on metastasis detection using data from a prior reader study.
Methods: In the prior reader study, 25 radiologists examined 40 CT exams each and circumscribed all suspected hepatic metastases. CT exams were chosen to include a total of 91 visually challenging metastases. The detectability of a metastasis was defined as the fraction of radiologists that circumscribed it. A conspicuity index was calculated for each metastasis by multiplying metastasis diameter with its contrast, defined as the difference between the average of a circular region within the metastasis and the average of the surrounding circular region of liver parenchyma. The effects of distance from liver edge and of conspicuity index on metastasis detectability were measured using multivariable linear regression.
Results: The median metastasis was 1.4 cm from the edge (interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-2.1 cm). Its diameter was 1.2 cm (IQR, 0.9-1.8 cm), and its contrast was 38 HU (IQR, 23-68 HU). An increase of one standard deviation in conspicuity index was associated with a 6.9% increase in detectability (p = 0.008), whereas an increase of one standard deviation in distance from the liver edge was associated with a 5.5% increase in detectability (p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Peripheral liver metastases were missed more frequently than central liver metastases, with this effect depending on metastasis size and contrast.
Keywords: Eye tracking; Liver metastases; Search errors.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: Research support for Cynthia McCollough and Joel Fletcher is provided to Mayo Clinic from Siemens Healthineers, unrelated to this work. The other authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Research reported in this article was supported by the National Institutes of Health under award number R01 EB017095. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Health.
Figures
References
-
- Albrecht MH, Wichmann JL, Muller C et al. (2014) Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation. Eur J Radiol 83:1752–1758 - PubMed
-
- Goenka AH, Herts BR, Obuchowski NA et al. (2014) Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study. Radiology 272:154–163 - PubMed
-
- Nakai H, Arizono S, Isoda H, Togashi K (2019) Imaging Characteristics of Liver Metastases Overlooked at Contrast-Enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 212:782–787 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
