Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;129(9):1288-1302.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01850-7. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

Budget impact analysis of introducing digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening in Italy

Collaborators, Affiliations

Budget impact analysis of introducing digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening in Italy

Olivera Djuric et al. Radiol Med. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: This study quantifies the impact on budget and cost per health benefit of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in place of digital mammography (DM) for breast cancer screening among asymptomatic women in Italy.

Methods: A budget impact analysis and a cost consequence analysis were conducted using parameters from the MAITA project and literature. The study considered four scenarios for DBT implementation, i.e., DBT for all women, DBT for women aged 45-49 years, DBT based on breast density (BI-RADS C + D or D only), and compared these to the current DM screening. Healthcare provider's perspective was adopted, including screening, diagnosis, and cancer treatment costs.

Results: Introducing DBT for all women would increase overall screening costs by 20%. Targeting DBT to women aged 45-49 years or with dense breasts would result in smaller cost increases (3.2% for age-based and 1.4-10.7% for density-based scenarios). The cost per avoided interval cancer was significantly higher when DBT was applied to all women compared to targeted approaches. The cost per gained early-detected cancer slightly increases in targeted approaches, while the assumptions on the clinical significance and overdiagnosis of cancers detected by DBT and not by DM have a strong impact.

Conclusions: Implementing DBT as a primary breast cancer test in screening programs in Italy would lead to a substantial increase in costs. Tailoring DBT use to women aged 45-49 or with dense breasts could enhance the feasibility and sustainability of the intervention. Further research is needed to clarify the impact of DBT on overdiagnosis and the long-term outcomes.

Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Budget impact analysis; Cost; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Mass screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, Vignat J, Gralow JR, Cardoso F, Siesling S, Soerjomataram I (2022) Current and future burden of breast cancer: global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast 66:15–23 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Alabousi M, Wadera A, Kashif Al-Ghita M, Kashef Al-Ghetaa R, Salameh JP, Pozdnyakov A et al (2021) Performance of digital breast tomosynthesis, synthetic mammography, and digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 113(6):680–690 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Gao Y, Moy L, Heller SL (2021) Digital breast tomosynthesis: update on technology, evidence, and clinical practice. Radiographics 41(2):321–337 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ko MJ, Park DA, Kim SH, Ko ES, Shin KH, Lim W, Kwak BS, Chang JM (2021) Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 22(8):1240–1252 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Pattacini P, Nitrosi A, Giorgi Rossi P, Duffy SW, Iotti V, Ginocchi V et al (2022) A randomized trial comparing breast cancer incidence and interval cancers after tomosynthesis plus mammography versus mammography alone. Radiology 303(2):256–266 - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources