Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;35(3):197-224.
doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09475-5. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

Hadza Landscape Burning

Affiliations

Hadza Landscape Burning

Jacob A Harris et al. Hum Nat. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

We present the first published ethnographic description of landscape burning by Hadza hunter-gatherers of northern Tanzania and identify environmental, social, and cultural influences on Hadza landscape burning, thereby broadening the ethnographic record of anthropogenic burning practices described for hunter-gatherer communities. We report interview data collected in 2022 and 2023, describing their practices and attitudes regarding the causes and consequences of burning. We provide context by comparing our observations with those recorded for hunting and gathering populations in Africa, Australia, and North America. Hadza landscape burning is generally a solitary and male-dominated activity, contrary to ethnographic accounts of Indigenous landscape burning from North America and Australia. The primary goals stated by Hadza for landscape burning were improved hunting, reduced hazards from dangerous animals, and to reduce the density of livestock. Firsthand observations suggest that landscape burning has decreased over the past 20 years, and this historical trend is supported by interviews. Satellite imagery also suggests an overall decrease in burning activity in the region from 2001 to 2022. Among the Hadza, landscape burning is a culturally influenced and strongly gender-biased activity that is rapidly disappearing. Because burning can radically transform landscapes, these practices often generate or amplify conflicts of interest between groups with different land use strategies. Hadza report serious social conflict with pastoralists over landscape burning, and our study suggests this tension has constrained the practice in the past two decades.

Keywords: Behavioral ecology; Ethnic conflict; Fire ecology; Hunter-gatherers; Indigenous land management; Landscape burning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist. Permissions: UCLA Institutional Review Board approval: IRB19-000105-CR-00002. COSTECH permits: 2023-448-NA-2000-080; 2023-447-NA-2000-080.

Similar articles

References

    1. Allan, G. E., & Southgate, R. I. (2002). Fire regimes in the spinifex landscapes of Australia. In R. J. Williams, A. M. Gill, & R. A. Bradstock (Eds.), Flammable australia: The fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent (pp. 145–176). Cambridge University Press
    1. Anderson, M. K. (1993). The experimental approach to assessment of the potential ecological effects of horticultural practices by Indigenous peoples on California wildlands. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
    1. Anderson, M. K. (1999). The fire, pruning, and coppice management of temperate ecosystems for basketry material by California Indian tribes. Human Ecology, 27, 79–113. - DOI
    1. Anderson, M. K. (2005). Tending the wild: Native American knowledge and the management of California’s natural resources. University of California Press.
    1. Anderson, M. K. (2006). The use of fire by Native Americans in California. In N. Sugihara (Ed.), Fire in California’s ecosystems (pp. 417–430). University of California Press

LinkOut - more resources