Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 22;8(20):5371-5381.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013726.

Outcome of patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide either before or after CAR T-cell therapy

Affiliations

Outcome of patients with large B-cell lymphoma treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide either before or after CAR T-cell therapy

Vincent Camus et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (TAFA-LEN) treatment relevance pre- or post-anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is debated. We analyzed patients with large B-cell lymphoma in the DESCAR-T registry treated with axi[1]cel or tisa-cel in ≥3rd line and TAFA-LEN before (n = 15, "TL-pre-CAR-T" set) or directly after (n = 52, "TL-post-CAR-T" set) CAR T-cell therapy. We compared TAFA-LEN v. other treatments using inverse probability weighting in the TL-post-CAR[1]T set. In the TL-post-CAR-T set, the median progression-free survival (mPFS), overall survival (mOS), and duration of response (mDOR) since the first treatment for progression (mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2) were 3, 4.7, and 8.1 months, respectively. The best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) after TAFA-LEN were 13.5% and 7.7%, respectively. Outcomes were better for patients who relapsed >6 months after CAR T-cell therapy (mPFS2: 5.6 vs 2 months, P = .0138; mOS2: not reached vs 3.8 months, P = .0034). The bORR and bCRR between TAFA-LEN and other treatments were 20.6% vs 24.9% and 11.6% vs 15.6%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between TAFA-LEN and other treatments (mPFS2: 2.9 vs 2.4 months, P = .91; mOS2: 3.3 vs 5.5 months, P = .06). In an exploratory analysis of the TL-pre-CAR-T set, the median TAFA-LEN treatment duration before CAR-T was 3.7 months with no patient becoming CD19 negative. The bORR, bCRR, 6- month PFS, and OS rates after CAR T-cell infusion were 45.5%, 36.4%, 20.1%, and 58.2%, respectively. Neither TAFA-LEN nor comparative salvage treatment improved outcomes for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: V.C. has received honoraria from Incyte, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ideogen, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Kite/Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Octapharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Takeda. P.S. has received honoraria from Chugai, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, AbbVie, and Roche. J.P. has received honoraria from Incyte. L.D.L.R. has received honoraria from Novartis and Kite/Gilead. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flowchart. DESCAR-T, Dispositif d'Enregistrement et Suivi des patients traités par CAR T cells.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Outcomes Based on Timing of Progression After CAR T-Cell Therapy. PFS (A) and OS (B) since treatment for the first progression (PFS2 and OS2) in the TL-post-CAR-T set according to early (≤6 months) vs late (>6 months) TAFA-LEN introduction. CI, confidence interval; NA, not available.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparison between TAFA-LEN and other treatments as initial therapies for progression after CAR T-cell therapy. PFS (A) and OS (B) since the first treatment for progression after CAR T-cell therapy according to IPW using stabilized weight (SW) method between TAFA-LEN and other treatments.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison between TAFA-LEN and LEN as initial therapies for progression after CAR T-cell therapy. PFS (A) and OS (B) since the first treatment for progression after CAR T-cell therapy according to IPW using SW between TAFA-LEN and LEN (single agent).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Outcomes after CAR T-cell infusion. PFS (A) and OS (B) after CAR T-cell infusion in the TL-pre-CAR-T set.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531–2544. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):45–56. - PubMed
    1. Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):839–852. - PubMed
    1. Nastoupil LJ, Jain MD, Feng L, et al. Standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: results from the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(27):3119–3128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, et al. Two-year follow-up of transcend NHL 001, a multicenter phase 1 study of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) Blood. 2021;138(suppl 1):2840–2843.

Publication types