Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):959.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11445-7.

Has cross-level clinical coordination changed in the context of the pandemic? The case of the Catalan health system

Daniela Campaz-Landazabal  1 , Ingrid Vargas  2 , Elvira Sánchez  3 , Francesc Cots  4 , Pere Plaja  5 , Joan Manuel Perez-Castejón  6 , Antonio Sánchez-Hidalgo  7 , María Luisa Vázquez  1
Affiliations

Has cross-level clinical coordination changed in the context of the pandemic? The case of the Catalan health system

Daniela Campaz-Landazabal et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic triggered numerous changes in health services organisation, whose effects on clinical coordination are unknown. The aim is to analyse changes in the experience and perception of cross-level clinical coordination and related factors of primary (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors in the Catalan health system between 2017 and 2022.

Methods: Comparison of two cross-sectional studies based on online surveys by means of the self-administration of the COORDENA-CAT (2017) and COORDENA-TICs (2022) questionnaires to PC and SC doctors. Final sample n = 3308 in 2017 and n = 2277 in 2022.

Outcome variables: experience of cross-level information and clinical management coordination and perception of cross-level clinical coordination in the healthcare area and related factors. Stratification variables: level of care and year. Adjusting variables: sex, years of experience, type of specialty, type of hospital, type of management of PC/SC. Descriptive bivariate and multivariate analysis using Poisson regressions models to detect changes between years in total and by levels of care.

Results: Compared with 2017, while cross-level clinical information coordination remained relatively high, with a slight improvement, doctors of both care levels reported a worse experience of cross-level clinical management coordination, particularly of care consistency (repetition of test) and accessibility to PC and, of general perception, which was worse in SC doctors. There was also a worsening in organisational (institutional support, set objectives, time available for coordination), attitudinal (job satisfaction) and interactional factors (knowledge between doctors). The use of ICT-based coordination mechanisms such as shared electronic medical records and electronic consultations between PC and SC increased, while the participation in virtual joint clinical conferences was limited.

Conclusions: Results show a slight improvement in clinical information but also less expected setbacks in some dimensions of clinical management coordination and in the perception of clinical coordination, suggesting that the increased use of some ICT-based coordination mechanisms did not counteract the effect of the worsened organisational, interactional, and attitudinal factors during the pandemic. Strategies are needed to facilitate direct communication, to improve conditions for the effective use of mechanisms and policies to protect healthcare professionals and services in order to better cope with new crises.

Keywords: COVID-19; Care coordination; Clinical coordination; Coordination mechanisms; ICT-based coordination mechanism; Pandemic; Primary care; Secondary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reasons for a low perception of clinical coordination within the area, total and by level of care. Year 2022
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Suggestions for improving coordination, total and by level of care. Year 2022
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ovretveit J. Does clinical coordination improve quality and save money - A summary review of the evidence. The health foundation [Internet]. 2011;2(June):1–30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21325659
    1. Motulsky A, Sicotte C, MP M, Schuster T, Girard N, Buckeridge D et al. Using Health Information Exchange: Usage and Perceived Usefulness in Primary Care. Stud Health Technol Inform [Internet]. 2019;264:709–13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31438016/ - PubMed
    1. Sampson R, Cooper J, Barbour R, Polson R, Wilson P. Patients’ perspectives on the medical primary–secondary care interface: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008708. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bywood P, Jackson-Bowers E, Muecke S. Initiatives to integrate primary and acute health care, including ambulatory care services. Adelaide: Primary Health Care Research & Information Service; 2011.
    1. Simpson K, Nham W, Thariath J, Schafer H, Greenwood-Eriksen M, Fetters MD et al. How health systems facilitate patient-centered care and care coordination: a case series analysis to identify best practices. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2022;22(1):1448. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-022-08623-w - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources