Driving improvement of diagnosis and awareness of heavy menstrual bleeding in women among physicians
- PMID: 39165008
- DOI: 10.1111/hae.15088
Driving improvement of diagnosis and awareness of heavy menstrual bleeding in women among physicians
Abstract
Introduction: A number of barriers in care exist for women/girls with bleeding disorders. Little progress has been made to overcome them, particularly regarding levels of awareness of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and women/girls.
Aim: To evaluate awareness and perception of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and bleeding disorders among HCPs and women/girls.
Methods: A three-part qualitative study was conducted, including HCPs and women/girls from over seven countries. Part 1 included eleven 60-min interviews with experts discussing HMB diagnostic barriers, which were further assessed in surveys among 6099 women/girls, 353 general practitioners (GPs), and 426 obstetricians and gynaecologists (OB/GYNs) during Part 2. Part 3 included three 1.5-2-h workshops with 20 clinicians and patient representatives covering HMB knowledge, criteria defining HMB and HCP resourcing for diagnosis.
Results: Many HCPs do not conduct certain investigations for women/girls presenting with HMB, and 22% of GPs lack confidence in the management of HMB. Only 8% of GPs use screening tools to evaluate menstrual blood loss, and 13% of GPs and 15% of OB/GYNs assess underlying bleeding disorders. Seventy-six percent of menstruating women/girls believed they could recognise HMB symptoms 'well'. However, 23% of these women/girls would not seek medical advice for abnormal/prolonged menstruation disrupting their lives. Disruptions were reported in 34% of women/girls from the general population and 61% of women with at-risk symptoms of HMB.
Conclusion: Many women/girls and HCPs have limited awareness of important HMB indicators. There is a need for standardized clinical criteria to promote efficient diagnoses and management.
Keywords: girls; heavy menstrual bleeding; inherited bleeding disorders; menstruation; qualitative research women's health.
Haemophilia© 2024 The Author(s). Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sriprasert I, Pakrashi T, Kimble T, Archer DF. Heavy menstrual bleeding diagnosis and medical management. Contracept Reprod Med. 2017;2:1‐8.
-
- Fraser IS, Mansour D, Breymann C, Hoffman C, Mezzacasa A, Petraglia F. Prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding and experiences of affected women in a European patient survey. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;128:196‐200.
-
- Noone D, Skouw‐Rasmussen N, Lavin M, van Galen KP, Kadir RA. Barriers and challenges faced by women with congenital bleeding disorders in Europe: results of a patient survey conducted by the European Haemophilia Consortium. Haemophilia. 2019;25:468‐474.
-
- Abdul‐Kadir R, Tarawah A, Shridhar N, Kulkarni R. Driving change: improving diagnosis and awareness of heavy menstrual bleeding and bleeding disorders in women and girls among healthcare providers. Blood. 2022;140:2717‐2718.
-
- Carlson LJ, Shaw ND. Development of ovulatory menstrual cycles in adolescent girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32:249‐253.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
