Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 6;128(32):13395-13401.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c03656. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.

Differences in Interfacial Reactivity of Graphite and Lithium Metal Battery Electrodes Investigated Via Operando Gas Analysis

Affiliations

Differences in Interfacial Reactivity of Graphite and Lithium Metal Battery Electrodes Investigated Via Operando Gas Analysis

J Padmanabhan Vivek et al. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. .

Abstract

Gases evolved from lithium batteries can drastically affect their performance and safety; for example, cell swelling is a serious safety issue. Here, we combine operando pressure measurements and online electrochemical mass spectrometry measurements to identify the nature and quantity of gases formed in batteries with graphite and lithium metal electrodes. We demonstrate that ethylene, a main gas evolved in SEI formation reactions, is quickly consumed at lithium metal electrodes unless they have been pretreated in the electrolyte. Polyolefins such as polyethylene are suggested as the possible reaction product from ethylene consumption, evidencing another pathway of SEI formation that had been previously overlooked because it does not produce any gas product.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Operando pressure measurements of a graphite vs lithium cell. Prior to the measurements, the lithium electrode had been soaked in electrolyte for 24 h, and additionally, the cell was left for equilibration with the graphite at 1.5 V vs Li+/Li for 48 h.
Figure 2
Figure 2
As in Figure 1, but with a graphite vs lithium cell in which the lithium electrode was not presoaked in the electrolyte and with a rest period for cell equilibration of only 6 h.
Figure 3
Figure 3
As in Figure 1, but with a graphite vs oversized LiFePO4 cell, cycling at a C-rate of C/5 between potentials corresponding to 1.45 V and 5 mV vs Li+/Li, except for the 4th cycle, in which a lower potential limit of −50 mV vs Li+/Li was used.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of the analysis of gases evolved from a graphite vs LiFePO4 cell using the OEMS system shown in Figure S7 and the experimental conditions in Figure 3.

References

    1. Balakrishnan P. G.; Ramesh R.; Prem Kumar T. Safety Mechanisms in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2006, 155 (2), 401–414. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.002. - DOI
    1. Wang Q.; Ping P.; Zhao X.; Chu G.; Sun J.; Chen C. Thermal Runaway Caused Fire and Explosion of Lithium Ion Battery. J. Power Sources 2012, 208, 210–224. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.038. - DOI
    1. Choi D.; Shamim N.; Crawford A.; Huang Q.; Vartanian C. K.; Viswanathan V. V.; Paiss M. D.; Alam M. J. E.; Reed D. M.; Sprenkle V. L. Li-Ion Battery Technology for Grid Application. J. Power Sources 2021, 511, 230419.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230419. - DOI
    1. Kong W.; Li H.; Huang X.; Chen L. Gas Evolution Behaviors for Several Cathode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2005, 142 (1–2), 285–291. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.008. - DOI
    1. Aiken C. P.; Xia J.; Wang D. Y.; Stevens D. A.; Trussler S.; Dahn J. R. An Apparatus for the Study of In Situ Gas Evolution in Li-Ion Pouch Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 161 (10), A1548–A1554. 10.1149/2.0151410jes. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources