Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 6:5:1393309.
doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1393309. eCollection 2024.

A systematic review of diabetic foot infections: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management strategies

Affiliations

A systematic review of diabetic foot infections: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management strategies

Sabyasachi Maity et al. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. .

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot infection represents a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, contributing substantially to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure worldwide. Accurate diagnosis relies on a comprehensive assessment integrating clinical evaluation, imaging studies, and microbiological analysis. Management necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing surgical intervention, antimicrobial therapy, and advanced wound care strategies. Preventive measures are paramount in reducing the incidence and severity, emphasizing patient education, regular foot screenings, and early intervention.

Methods: The researchers performed a systematic review of literature using PUBMED MESH keywords. Additionally, the study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews at the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York (CRD42021277788). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the microbial spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility patterns observed in diabetic foot infections.

Results: The search through the databases finally identified 13 articles with 2545 patients from 2021 to 2023. Overall, the predominant Gram-positive microbial species isolated were Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus fecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Whereas the predominant Gram-negative included Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Conclusion: Diabetic foot infections represent a complex and multifaceted clinical entity, necessitating a holistic approach to diagnosis, management, and prevention. Limited high-quality research data on outcomes and the effectiveness of guideline recommendations pose challenges in updating and refining existing DFI management guidelines.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021277788, identifier CRD42021277788.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; diabetic foot infection; gram negative (G -) bacteria; gram positive (G +) bacteria; podiatry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Represents the process of study selections for the systematic review as per the PRISMA protocol.

References

    1. Armstrong DG, Tan TW, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers: A review. JAMA. (2023) 330:62–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10578 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bandyk DF. The diabetic foot: Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. Semin. Vasc. Surg. (2018) 31:43–8. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2019.02.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hawkins BK, Barnard M, Barber KE, Stover KR, Cretella DA, Wingler MJB, et al. . Diabetic foot infections: A microbiologic review. Foot (Edinburgh Scotland). (2022) 51:101877. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101877 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mponponsuo K, Sibbald RG, Somayaji R. A comprehensive review of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of diabetic foot infections. Adv. Skin Wound Care. (2021) 34:574–81. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000791876.10485.d4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. (2000) 283:2008–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources