Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;66(4):682-701.
doi: 10.5187/jast.2024.e75. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Estimation of genetic correlations and genomic prediction accuracy for reproductive and carcass traits in Hanwoo cows

Affiliations

Estimation of genetic correlations and genomic prediction accuracy for reproductive and carcass traits in Hanwoo cows

Md Azizul Haque et al. J Anim Sci Technol. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

This study estimated the heritabilities (h2) and genetic and phenotypic correlations between reproductive traits, including calving interval (CI), age at first calving (AFC), gestation length (GL), number of artificial inseminations per conception (NAIPC), and carcass traits, including carcass weight (CWT), eye muscle area (EMA), backfat thickness (BF), and marbling score (MS) in Korean Hanwoo cows. In addition, the accuracy of genomic predictions of breeding values was evaluated by applying the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and the weighted GBLUP (WGBLUP) method. The phenotypic data for reproductive and carcass traits were collected from 1,544 Hanwoo cows, and all animals were genotyped using Illumina Bovine 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip. The genetic parameters were estimated using a multi-trait animal model using the MTG2 program. The estimated h2 for CI, AFC, GL, NAIPC, CWT, EMA, BF, and MS were 0.10, 0.13, 0.17, 0.11, 0.37, 0.35, 0.27, and 0.45, respectively, according to the GBLUP model. The GBLUP accuracy estimates ranged from 0.51 to 0.74, while the WGBLUP accuracy estimates for the traits under study ranged from 0.51 to 0.79. Strong and favorable genetic correlations were observed between GL and NAIPC (0.61), CWT and EMA (0.60), NAIPC and CWT (0.49), AFC and CWT (0.48), CI and GL (0.36), BF and MS (0.35), NAIPC and EMA (0.35), CI and BF (0.30), EMA and MS (0.28), CI and AFC (0.26), AFC and EMA (0.24), and AFC and BF (0.21). The present study identified low to moderate positive genetic correlations between reproductive and CWT traits, suggesting that a heavier body weight may lead to a longer CI, AFC, GL, and NAIPC. The moderately positive genetic correlation between CWT and AFC, and NAIPC, with a phenotypic correlation of nearly zero, suggesting that the genotype-environment interactions are more likely to be responsible for the phenotypic manifestation of these traits. As a result, the inclusion of these traits by breeders as selection criteria may present a good opportunity for developing a selection index to increase the response to the selection and identification of candidate animals, which can result in significantly increased profitability of production systems.

Keywords: Carcass traits; Correlation; Hanwoo; Heritability; Reproductive traits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Phenotypic distribution.
(A) Reproductive traits and (B) Carcass traits in Hanwoo cows. The red dashed lines indicate the mean of the trait. CI, calving interval; AFC, age at first calving; GL, gestation length; NAIPC, number of artificial inseminations per conception; CWT, carcass weight; EMA, eye muscle area; BF, backfat thickness; MS, marbling score.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee SH, Park BH, Sharma A, Dang CG, Lee SS, Choi TJ, et al. Hanwoo cattle: origin, domestication, breeding strategies and genomic selection. J Anim Sci Technol. 2014;56:2. doi: 10.1186/2055-0391-56-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jo C, Cho SH, Chang J, Nam KC. Keys to production and processing of Hanwoo beef: a perspective of tradition and science. Anim Front. 2012;2:32–8. doi: 10.2527/af.2012-0060. - DOI
    1. Dekkers JCM. Estimation of economic values for dairy cattle breeding goals: bias due to sub-optimal management policies. Livest Prod Sci. 1991;29:131–49. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(91)90062-U. - DOI
    1. Boichard D. Estimation of the economic value of conception rate in dairy cattle. Livest Prod Sci. 1990;24:187–204. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(90)90001-M. - DOI
    1. Cammack KM, Thomas MG, Enns RM. Reproductive traits and their heritabilities in beef cattle. Prof Anim Sci. 2009;25:517–28. doi: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30753-1. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources