Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 6:11:1365587.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1365587. eCollection 2024.

Association of obesity with osteoporotic fracture risk in individuals with bone metabolism-related conditions: a cross sectional analysis

Affiliations

Association of obesity with osteoporotic fracture risk in individuals with bone metabolism-related conditions: a cross sectional analysis

Guijun Yang et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the individual and composite associations of different indices of obesity on osteoporotic fractures at three different sites among individuals affected by conditions influencing bone metabolism.

Methods: Participants were included from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a national cross-sectional survey. BMI and WC were used separately and in combination to evaluate the presence of obesity. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, WC ≥ 88 cm in females, and WC ≥ 102 cm in males. Associations between obesity and osteoporotic fractures were assessed using multivariable logistic regression and OR curves. Associations modified by age, sex, race, and alcohol consumption were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 5377 participants were included in this study. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, we found that BMI, WC, BMI defining obesity, and WC defining obesity were negatively associated with hip fracture (all p < 0.05). However, harmful associations between WC and BMI defining obesity and spine fracture were found (all p < 0.05). OR curves revealed that BMI and WC had a linear relationship with hip and spine fractures (all P for non-linearity >0.05). Further analyses showed that the highest WC quartile was harmfully associated with a higher risk of spine fractures (p < 0.05). Obese participants diagnosed by both BMI and WC were less likely to have hip fractures but more likely to have spine fractures (all P for trend <0.05). A significant interaction between age (Ref: age < 50 years) and BMI and WC was detected for hip fractures (all P for interaction <0.05).

Discussion: In people with conditions influencing bone metabolism, obesity diagnosed by BMI and WC was associated with a lower risk of hip fracture, while obesity diagnosed by BMI and the highest WC quartile were associated with a higher risk of spine fracture.

Keywords: BMI (body mass index); WC (waist circumference); bone metabolism; obesity; osteoporotic fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participants’ selection. BMI, Body Mass Index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear dose–response analysis on BMI and WC and hip fracture. Restricted cubic spline regression with 5 knots at the 5, 27.5, 50, 72.5 and 95th percentiles was used to explore the potential dose–response relationship between BMI and WC and hip fracture. (A) The relationship between BMI and hip fracture in all participants; (a) the relationship between BMI and hip fracture in participants ≥50 years; (B) the relationship between WC and hip fracture in all participants; (b) the relationship between WC and hip fracture in participants ≥50 years.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Linear dose–response analysis on WC and spine fracture in all participants. Restricted cubic spline regression with 5 knots at the 5, 27.5, 50, 72.5 and 95th percentiles was used to explore the potential dose–response relationship between WC and spine fracture in all participants.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sozen T, Ozisik L, Basaran NC. An overview and management of osteoporosis. Eur J Rheumatol. (2017) 4:46–56. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2016.048, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. (2006) 17:1726–33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mullin BH, Tickner J, Zhu K, Kenny J, Mullin S, Brown SJ, et al. . Characterisation of genetic regulatory effects for osteoporosis risk variants in human osteoclasts. Genome Biol. (2020) 21:80. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-01997-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Areeckal AS, Kocher M. Current and emerging diagnostic imaging-based techniques for assessment of osteoporosis and fracture risk. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. (2019) 12:254–68. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2018.2852620, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou S, Greenberger JS, Epperly MW, Goff JP, Adler C, Leboff MS, et al. . Age-related intrinsic changes in human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to osteoblasts. Aging Cell. (2008) 7:335–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00377.x, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources