Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):1416-1427.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.068564. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Effects of Sedentary Behavior Reduction on Blood Pressure in Desk Workers: Results From the RESET-BP Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Sedentary Behavior Reduction on Blood Pressure in Desk Workers: Results From the RESET-BP Randomized Clinical Trial

Bethany Barone Gibbs et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Sedentary behavior (SB) is observationally associated with cardiovascular disease risk. However, randomized clinical trials testing causation are limited. We hypothesized that reducing SB would decrease blood pressure (BP) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) in sedentary adults.

Methods: This parallel-arm, 3-month randomized clinical trial recruited desk workers, age 18 to 65 years, with systolic BP 120 to 159 or diastolic BP (DBP) 80 to 99 mm Hg, off antihypertensive medications, and reporting <150 min/wk of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity. Participants were randomized to a SB reduction intervention or a no-contact control group. The intervention sought to replace 2 to 4 h/d of SB with standing and stepping through coaching, a wrist-worn activity prompter, and a sit-stand desk. SB and physical activity were measured with a thigh-worn accelerometer and quantified during all waking hours and separately during work and nonwork times. Clinic-based resting systolic BP (primary outcome) and DBP, 24-hour ambulatory BP, and PWV were assessed by blinded technicians at baseline and 3 months.

Results: Participants (n=271) had a mean age of 45 years and systolic BP/DBP 129/83 mm Hg. Compared with controls, intervention participants reduced SB (-1.15±0.17 h/d), increased standing (0.94±0.14 h/d), and increased stepping (5.4±2.4 min/d; all P<0.05). SB and activity changes mainly occurred during work time and were below the goal. The intervention did not reduce BP or PWV in the intervention group compared with controls. Between-group differences in resting systolic BP and DBP changes were -0.22±0.90 (P=0.808) and 0.13±0.61 mm Hg (P=0.827), respectively. The findings were similarly null for ambulatory BP and PWV. Decreases in work-time SB were associated with favorable reductions in resting DBP (r=0.15, P=0.017). Contrary to our hypotheses, reductions in work-time SB (r=-0.19, P=0.006) and increases in work-time standing (r=0.17, P=0.011) were associated with unfavorable increases in carotid-femoral PWV. As expected, increases in nonwork-time standing were favorably associated with carotid-femoral PWV (r=-0.14, P=0.038).

Conclusions: A 3-month intervention that decreased SB and increased standing by ≈1 hour during the work day was not effective for reducing BP. Future directions include examining effects of interventions reducing SB through activity other than work-time standing and clarifying association between standing and PWV in opposite directions for work and nonwork time.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03307343.

Keywords: behavior; blood pressure; randomized controlled trial; vascular stiffness; work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Jakicic reports participation on a Scientific Advisory Board for Wondr Health, Inc; ownership of Healthy Lifestyles Consulting, LLC; and a role as principal investigator of the clinical site for a research study awarded to the University of Kansas Medical Center by Epitomee Medical, Inc. The other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
CONSORT diagram. BP indicates blood pressure; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; and MVPA, moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:785–802. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:e13–e115. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065 - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Miles MA, Jaeger BC, Hannon L, III, Hardy ST, Ostchega Y, Wozniak G, Schwartz JE. Blood pressure control among US adults, 2009 to 2012 through 2017 to 2020. Hypertension. 2022;79:1971–1980. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19222 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, Chastin SFM, Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJM; SBRN Terminology Consensus Project Participants. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)–terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Powell KE, Jakicic JM, Troiano RP, Piercy K, Tennant B; 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Sedentary behavior and health: update from the 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:1227–1241. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001935 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data