Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 19;77Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20230041.
doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0041. eCollection 2024.

The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

The use of individual tracking programs in public health: a bioethics dilemma

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Ricardo Jardim Neiva et al. Rev Bras Enferm. .

Abstract

Objective: to understand the bioethical perspectives on mobile tracking device use.

Methods: theoretical study based on action research, carried out with eight graduate students from a public university. A focus group was used, with a thematic content analysis methodology with a codebook structure, approved by the Research Ethics Committee.

Results: from the analysis, there was a concern about using devices after the pandemic ended. Using or not the device, rights inherent to humans, legislation and effectiveness of methods deepen interpretations, moving participants from a personalistic conception of the topic to a vision focused on professional implications about the methods.

Final considerations: the debate on the impact of using technological devices on health, especially those that imply restriction of rights that refer to individuals' private life, involves a discussion of a professional nature, in addition to requirement for clear rules on the topic.

Objetivo:: comprender las perspectivas bioéticas sobre el uso de dispositivos móviles de seguimiento.

Métodos:: estudio teórico basado en la investigación acción, realizado con ocho estudiantes de posgrado de una universidad pública. Se utilizó un grupo focal, con metodología de análisis de contenido temático con estructura de libro de códigos, aprobada por el Comité de Ética en Investigación.

Resultados:: del análisis surgió la preocupación por el uso de dispositivos una vez terminada la pandemia. El uso o no del dispositivo, los derechos inherentes a la persona humana, la legislación y la eficacia de los métodos profundizan las interpretaciones, trasladando a los participantes de una concepción personalista del tema a una visión centrada en las implicaciones profesionales de los métodos.

Consideraciones finales:: el debate sobre el impacto del uso de dispositivos tecnológicos en la salud, especialmente aquellos que implican restricción de derechos que se refieren a la vida privada de las personas, implica una discusión profesional, además de la exigencia de reglas claras sobre el tema.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Souza EV, Nunes GA, Silva CS, Silva BF, Filho, Lapa PS, Duarte PD, et al. Identificação de situações e condutas bioéticas na atuação profissional em saúde. Rev Bioet. 2021;29(1):148–161. doi: 10.1590/1983-80422021291455. - DOI
    1. Mota LCS, Oliveira LN, Silva EE, Siqueira BR. Tomada de decisão em (bio)ética clínica: abordagens contemporâneas. Rev Bioét. 2016;24:304–314. doi: 10.1590/1983-80422016242131. - DOI
    1. Jonsen AR. O nascimento da bioética. Nova York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Lorenzo C, Neves F. Bioethics and sociology: the place of social studies of science and technology. Interface Comun Saúde Educ. 2023;27:e220046. doi: 10.1590/interface.220046. - DOI
    1. Silva AM, Silva CE, Siqueira MD, Marques KV. Proteção de dados pessoais e direito à privacidade no contexto da pandemia de covid-19: uma análise das aplicações de contact tracing à luz da proporcionalidade. Rev Direito GV. 2022;18(3) doi: 10.1590/2317-6172202232. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources