Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now
- PMID: 39168092
- DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01265
Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now
Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) will soon reach its 20-year anniversary in the United States and has now become the most performed shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. The evolution from Grammont style implants to lateralized designs continues to generate debate as comparable outcomes have been reported with both types of systems. While early literature focused on fixation and expanded indications, recent studies have evaluated component design and position and their effect on functional outcomes and complications. The purpose of this article was to provide a synopsis of design rationales of current RSA prostheses and review outcomes related to RSA design and position.
Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
References
-
- Shoulder and Elbow Registry (SER): 2023 Annual Report. American Academic of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Rosemont, IL, 2023.
-
- Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O'Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1476-1485.
-
- Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M: The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1697-1705.
-
- Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Walch G: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients with a biconcave glenoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1297-1304.
-
- Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D: The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:292-300.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
