Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;18(3):235-246.
doi: 10.1177/15586898241257549. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

Enhancing Qualitative and Quantitative Data Linkages in Complex Mixed Methods Designs: Illustrations from a Multi-Phase Healthcare Delivery Study

Affiliations

Enhancing Qualitative and Quantitative Data Linkages in Complex Mixed Methods Designs: Illustrations from a Multi-Phase Healthcare Delivery Study

P Paul Chandanabhumma et al. J Mix Methods Res. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

While mixed methods research is increasingly used to examine determinants of unwarranted variability in healthcare delivery and outcomes, novel integrative approaches are required to meet the needs of mixed methods healthcare delivery research. This article describes novel refining strategies that enhance the linkage between qualitative and quantitative dimensions of a mixed methods healthcare delivery research study. Leveraging our study experiences, this paper demonstrates several refining strategies: (1) using mediated allocation concealment to facilitate qualitative sampling; (2) informing qualitative inquiry through quantitative analytics; and (3) training and immersing multidisciplinary researchers in qualitative data collection and analysis. Developing and implementing strategies in mixed methods healthcare delivery research could advance methodological rigor and strengthen multidisciplinary collaboration.

Keywords: healthcare delivery; heart failure; mixed methods; team science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Procedural Diagram of the Study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Illustrative scouting report. Note. Illustrative information contained in this report is fictitious.

References

    1. Bazeley P (2009). Editorial: Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 203–207. 10.1177/1558689809334443 - DOI
    1. Bernard HR (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). AltaMira Press.
    1. Bryman A (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. 10.1177/2345678906290531 - DOI
    1. Castro FG, Kellison JG, Boyd SJ, & Kopak A (2010). A methodology for conducting integrative mixed methods research and data analyses. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 342–360. 10.1177/1558689810382916 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandanabhumma PP, Fàbregues S, Oetzel J, Duran B, & Ford C (2023a). Examining the influence of group diversity on the functioning of community-based participatory research partnerships: A mixed methods study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1–2), 242–254. 10.1002/ajcp.12626 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources