Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 1;23(1):103-118.
doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000454.

Evidence-informed decision-making in public health in Canada: a qualitative exploration

Isabella Romano  1   2 , Emily C Clark  3 , Janine Quiambao  1   2 , Miranda Horn  1 , Lynn Dare  1 , Kristin Rogers  3 , Maureen Dobbins  3   4
Affiliations

Evidence-informed decision-making in public health in Canada: a qualitative exploration

Isabella Romano et al. JBI Evid Implement. .

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) plays a vital role in public health practice. Canada has invested in support for evidence-informed approaches in public health. Despite growing expectations for EIDM, evidence integration has not been thoroughly evaluated.

Objective: This study explores EIDM within Canadian public health organizations before the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective is to explore how EIDM in public health was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected and analyzed from interviews with public health professionals across Canada.

Results: From interviews with 20 participants in four Canadian provinces and one territory, all participants noted that EIDM was valued, but there was considerable variation in implementation. Participants reported differences in consistency of evidence use, resources available at their public health organizations to support EIDM, and staff knowledge and skills in EIDM. Leadership emerged as a strong influencer of EIDM; however, leadership investment in EIDM varied. Changes in evidence use during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed an urgency for decision-making amidst an influx of evidence and reallocated staff roles.

Conclusions: Despite gains in the recognized value of EIDM, gaps remain in the integration of evidence into decision-making and adequate resource investment to support EIDM. Time, resources, and skills to adapt processes and implement EIDM are needed for public health organizations in Canada to fully integrate EIDM into all aspects of public health decision-making.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A249.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Green LW. Building capacity for evidence-based public health: reconciling the pulls of practice and the push of research. Annu Rev Public Health 2018; 39:27–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. A model for evidence-informed decision-making in public health [fact sheet] [internet]. NCCMT; 2021. Available from: https://www.nccmt.ca/uploads/media/media/0001/02/5da8cf329a940bdd81a956a.... - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peters DH, Tran NT, Adam T. Implementation research in health: a practical guide. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization; 2013.
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Core competencies for public health in Canada. 1st ed. PHAC; 2008.
    1. Dobbins M, Traynor RL, Workentine S, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Yost J. Impact of an organization-wide knowledge translation strategy to support evidence-informed public health decision-making. BMC Public Health 2018; 18 (1):1412. - PMC - PubMed