Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 22;332(16):1343-1354.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.14618. Online ahead of print.

Elinzanetant for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause: OASIS 1 and 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

Affiliations

Elinzanetant for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause: OASIS 1 and 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

JoAnn V Pinkerton et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Safe and effective nonhormonal treatments for menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are needed.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant, a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms.

Design, setting, and participants: Two randomized double-blind phase 3 trials (OASIS 1 and 2) included postmenopausal participants aged 40 to 65 years experiencing moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (OASIS 1: 77 sites in the US, Europe, and Israel from August 27, 2021, to November 27, 2023, and OASIS 2: 77 sites in the US, Canada, and Europe from October 29, 2021, to October 10, 2023).

Intervention: Once daily oral elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 26 weeks or matching placebo for 12 weeks followed by elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 14 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary end points included mean change in frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from baseline to weeks 4 and 12, measured by the electronic hot flash daily diary. Secondary end points included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b total T score and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire total score from baseline to week 12.

Results: Eligible participants (mean [SD] age, OASIS 1: 54.6 [4.9] years; OASIS 2: 54.6 [4.8] years) were randomized to elinzanetant (OASIS 1: n = 199; OASIS 2: n = 200) or placebo (OASIS 1: n = 197; OASIS 2: n = 200). A total of 309 (78.0%) and 324 (81.0%) completed OASIS 1 and 2, respectively. For the elinzanetant and placebo groups, the baseline mean (SD) VMS per 24 hours were 13.4 (6.6) vs 14.3 (13.9) (OASIS 1) and 14.7 (11.1) v 16.2 (11.2) (OASIS 2). Baseline VMS severity was 2.6 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 1) and 2.5 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 2). Elinzanetant significantly reduced VMS frequency at week 4 (OASIS 1: -3.3 [95% CI, -4.5 to -2.1], P < .001; OASIS 2: -3.0 [95% CI, -4.4 to -1.7], P < .001) and at week 12 (OASIS 1: -3.2 [95% CI, -4.8 to -1.6], P < .001; OASIS 2: -3.2 [95% CI, -4.6 to -1.9], P < .001). Elinzanetant also improved VMS severity at week 4 (OASIS 1: -0.3 [95% CI, -0.4 to -0.2], P < .001; OASIS 2: -0.2 [95 CI, -0.3 to -0.1], P < .001) and week 12 (OASIS 1: -0.4 [95% CI, -0.5 to -0.3], P < .001; OASIS 2: -0.3 [95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1], P < .001). Elinzanetant improved sleep disturbances and menopause-related quality of life at week 12, and the safety profile was favorable.

Conclusions and relevance: Elinzanetant was well tolerated and efficacious for moderate to severe menopausal VMS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: OASIS 1: NCT05042362, OASIS 2: NCT05099159.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Pinkerton reported grants from Bayer Pharmaceuticals to University of Virginia during the conduct of the study and consulting fees from Bayer Pharmaceutical to University of Virginia and independent contract work for Merck for chapters on abnormal bleeding and menopause. Dr Simon reported grants from Bayer Healthcare, AbbVie, Daré Bioscience, Mylan, and Myovant/Sumitomo and personal fees from Astellas Pharma, Ascend Therapeutics, California Institute of Integral Studies, Femasys, Khyra, Madorra, Mayne Pharma, Pfizer, Pharmavite, Scynexis Inc, Vella Bioscience, and Bayer; and stock from Sermonix Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. Dr Joffe reported personal fees from Bayer, Merck, and Hello Therapeutics and grants from National Institutes of Health and Merck outside the submitted work; Dr Joffe’s spouse is an employee of Arsenal Biosciences and has equity in Merck. Dr Maki reported personal fees from Bayer Consumer Care during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Astellas and Pfizer and equity from Midi Health, Alloy, and Estrigenix outside the submitted work, as well as serving as a trustee of the International Menopause Society. Dr Nappi reported personal fees from Abbott, Astellas, Bayer Healthcare, Besins Healthcare, Exeltis, Fidia, Merck & Co, Novo Nordisk, Organon, Shionogi, Theramex, and Viatris; grants from Gedeon Richter; and nonfinancial support from HRA Pharma outside the submitted work. Dr Panay reported personal fees from Bayer during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Abbott, Astellas, Besins, Gedeon Richter, Lawley, Theramex, and Viatris outside the submitted work. Dr Soares reported grants from Ontario Brain Institute, Eisai, Clairvoyant Therapeutics, and Diamond Therapeutics and personal fees from CAN-BIND Solutions, Otsuka, and Ontario Health outside the submitted work. Dr Thurston reported personal fees from Bayer during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Astellas, Hello Therapeutics, Happify Health (relationship has ended), and Vira Health (relationship has ended) outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Recruitment, Randomization, and Participant Flow in the OASIS 1 and OASIS 2 Trials
“Did not complete study” indicates did not complete all phases of the trial including the last visit (follow-up). aSix participants withdrew consent and 1 was not rescreened per protocol. bThree participants (0.8%) in OASIS 1 were randomized but did not receive treatment intervention and were, therefore, excluded from the safety analysis sets. One participant in the placebo group of each trial incorrectly received elinzanetant initially, and both were assigned to the elinzanetant groups for analyses based on the safety analysis set. cNo information provided by investigator. dWithdrew because of work.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Change From Baseline in Average Daily Vasomotor Symptom (VMS) Frequency and Severity by Treatment Group and Study
Score range 0-3 (0 indicates no moderate or severe vasomotor symptoms [at baseline] and no mild, moderate, or severe vasomotor symptoms [post baseline]; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe symptoms; higher scores indicate greater vasomotor symptom severity). Data shown are means (95% CIs). Zoomed-in presentation along the y-axis for illustration purposes. Only outliers within the displayed scale are visible. Connecting lines over time join arithmetic means by treatment group. A boxplot presentation of the full distribution is provided in eFigure 1 in Supplement 3 and the descriptive summary and data range are available in eTable 5 in Supplement 3. Placebo-elinzanetant, 120 mg, refers to the participants receiving placebo who were switched to receive elinzanetant after week 12. Efficacy analyses were performed on the full analysis set. The circles indicate outside values.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Change From Baseline in PROMIS SD SF 8b Total T Scorea and MENQOL Total Scoreb by Treatment Group and Study
A reduction in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD SF 8b) total T score and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire total score corresponded to an improvement in symptoms. Efficacy analyses were performed on the full analysis set. Connecting lines over time join arithmetic means by treatment group. The circles indicate outside values. aFor PROMIS SD SF 8b, the score ranges from 28.9 to 76.5 (<55, normal; 55-60, mild; 60-70, moderate; and >70, severe sleep disturbance). Higher scores indicate greater severity of sleep disturbance. bFor MENQOL, the score ranges from 1 to 8; higher scores indicate greater bother; and 0.9-point within-patient change represent a clinically meaningful difference.

Comment in

  • doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.15118

References

    1. Baker FC, de Zambotti M, Colrain IM, Bei B. Sleep problems during the menopausal transition: prevalence, impact, and management challenges. Nat Sci Sleep. 2018;10:73-95. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S125807 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thurston RC, Joffe H. Vasomotor symptoms and menopause: findings from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011;38(3):489-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kravitz HM, Zhao X, Bromberger JT, et al. Sleep disturbance during the menopausal transition in a multi-ethnic community sample of women. Sleep. 2008;31(7):979-990. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nappi RE, Kroll R, Siddiqui E, et al. Global cross-sectional survey of women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause: prevalence and quality of life burden. Menopause. 2021;28(8):875-882. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001793 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Utian WH. Psychosocial and socioeconomic burden of vasomotor symptoms in menopause: a comprehensive review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:47. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-47 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data