Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: a randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 39172725
- PMCID: PMC11573048
- DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002035
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of robust evidence on the efficacy of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy compared to open surgery. This study was aimed to compare time to functional recovery (FR) between laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Materials and methods: This pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial was conducted in seven tertiary centers. Patients with periampullary tumors were randomized using a block design in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by pancreatic fistula risk. Participants were randomized to undergo open or laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy by expert pancreatic surgeons. The primary outcome was the time to FR, defined as the number of days until FR was achieved in all five domains. The secondary endpoints included perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes.
Results: Between March 2019 and June 2022, 252 patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic ( n =125) or open groups ( n =127). Primary outcomes were reported in 235 patients. The mean time to FR was shorter in laparoscopic group compared to the open group (7.7 vs. 9.0 days, P =0.03). Laparoscopic group exhibited a higher cumulative rate of FR compared to the open group (Hazard ratio,1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.74; P =0.02). Severe complications, R0 resection, the number of retrieved lymph nodes and short-term survival rates were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy demonstrated modest advantages in FR time over open surgery for selected patients with experienced surgeons.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03870698.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no related conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures



References
-
- Klompmaker S, van Hilst J, Wellner UF, et al. . Outcomes after minimally-invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 2020;271:356–363. - PubMed
-
- Song KB, Kim SC, Lee W, et al. . Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center. Surg Endosc 2020;34:1343–1352. - PubMed
-
- Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B, et al. . Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:831–838. - PubMed
-
- Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, et al. . Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:222–230. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical