Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0309084.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309084. eCollection 2024.

Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool

Nathan Gabriel Sattah  1 , Vincent D'Anniballe  1 , Hoang Tu Le  2 , Luyen Thi Le  3 , Thanh Ngoc Le  3 , Thom Thi Vu  3 , Viengsakhone Louangpradith  4 , Walter T Lee  5
Affiliations

Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool

Nathan Gabriel Sattah et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: There is an increase in human subject research in developing countries and conducting them in an ethical manner depends on the research ethics oversight in these countries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the operational, financial, and educational characteristics of research ethics committees (RECs) at institutions in Vietnam and Laos.

Methods: A validated self-assessment tool designed to assess nine major characteristics of RECs was translated into Vietnamese and Laotian. The translated surveys were delivered to and completed by representatives from RECs at institutions in Vietnam and Laos. The surveys were collected, translated back into English, and scored. The data was analyzed to identify potential areas of strength and areas for improvement.

Results: The mean survey score for the 19 RECs surveyed was 165.3 out of a maximum of 200 points with a standard deviation of 22.9. Committees scored the highest in the review of specific protocol items (95.6%), submission arrangements and materials (89.5%), and the policies referring to review procedures (85.6%) domains. RECs scored the lowest in the resources domain (65.5%), with only 26.3% of committees having an annual budget. Nearly all RECs have standard operating procedures (94.7%) and policies for disclosing conflicts of interest (89.5%). Most committees use prior ethics training as a criterion to select REC chairs (78.9%) and members (73.7%), with the majority of committees requiring a training course in ethics (76.5%). 68.4% of committees have continuing education in ethics for members and only 42.1% of committees have a budget for member training.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that RECs in Vietnam and Laos have strong foundational review processes for research protocols. Important areas of improvement include improved institutional oversight, financial and administrative resources, and the continued ethics education for current committee members.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of duration of REC existence and total survey score.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Boxplot of scores by survey domain.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Normile D. The promise and pitfalls of clinical trials overseas. Science. 2008;322(5899):214–6. doi: 10.1126/science.322.5899.214 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atallah D, Moubarak M, El Kassis N, Abboud S. Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees—results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study. Trials. 2018;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2397-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang X, Hahne J, Li L, Khoshnood K, Yang G, Yuan H, et al.. Developing Quality and Efficiency of Institutional Review Board Review Under a Human Research Protection Program at a Leading Hospital in Central Southern China: A Descriptive Analysis of the First Three Years. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021;16(3):280–9. doi: 10.1177/1556264621995656 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sleem H, Abdelhai RA, Al-Abdallat I, Al-Naif M, Gabr HM, Kehil ET, et al.. Development of an accessible self-assessment tool for research ethics committees in developing countries. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010;5(3):85–96; quiz 7–8. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.85 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abou-Zeid A, Afzal M, Silverman HJ. Capacity mapping of national ethics committees in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. BMC Med Ethics. 2009;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources