Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025;122(1):114-121.
doi: 10.1159/000540559. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Neonatal Adverse Outcomes among Hospital Livebirths in Canada: A National Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Neonatal Adverse Outcomes among Hospital Livebirths in Canada: A National Retrospective Study

Chantal R M Nelson et al. Neonatology. 2025.

Abstract

Introduction: In Canada, newborn morbidity far surpasses mortality. The neonatal adverse outcome indicator (NAOI) summarizes neonatal morbidity, but Canadian trend data are lacking.

Methods: This Canada-wide retrospective cross-sectional study included hospital livebirths between 24 and 42 weeks' gestation, from 2013 to 2022. Data were obtained from the Canadian Institute of Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database, excluding Quebec. The NAOI included 15 newborn complications (e.g., birth trauma, intraventricular hemorrhage, or respiratory failure) and seven interventions (e.g., resuscitation by intubation and/or chest compressions), adapted from Australia's NAOI. Rates of NAOI were calculated by gestational age. Unadjusted rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and extended hospital stay, each in relation to the number of NAOI components present (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or ≥5).

Results: Among 2,821,671 newborns, the NAOI rate was 7.6%. NAOI increased from 7.3% in 2013 to 8.0% in 2022 (p < 0.01). NAOI prevalence was highest in the most preterm infants. Compared to no NAOI, RRs (95% CI) for mortality were 8.5 (7.6-9.5) with 1, 118.1 (108.4-128.4) with 3, and 395.3 (367.2-425.0) with ≥5 NAOI components. Respective RRs for NICU admission were 6.7 (6.6-6.7), 11.2 (10.9-11.3), and 11.9 (11.6-12.2), and RR for extended hospital stay were 6.6 (6.4-6.7), 12.2 (11.7-12.7), and 26.4 (25.2-27.5). International comparison suggested that Canada had a higher prevalence of NAOI.

Conclusion: The Canadian NAOI captures neonatal morbidity using hospitalization data and is associated with neonatal mortality, NICU admission, and extended hospital stay. Newborn morbidity may be on the rise in recent years.

Introduction: In Canada, newborn morbidity far surpasses mortality. The neonatal adverse outcome indicator (NAOI) summarizes neonatal morbidity, but Canadian trend data are lacking.

Methods: This Canada-wide retrospective cross-sectional study included hospital livebirths between 24 and 42 weeks' gestation, from 2013 to 2022. Data were obtained from the Canadian Institute of Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database, excluding Quebec. The NAOI included 15 newborn complications (e.g., birth trauma, intraventricular hemorrhage, or respiratory failure) and seven interventions (e.g., resuscitation by intubation and/or chest compressions), adapted from Australia's NAOI. Rates of NAOI were calculated by gestational age. Unadjusted rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for neonatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and extended hospital stay, each in relation to the number of NAOI components present (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or ≥5).

Results: Among 2,821,671 newborns, the NAOI rate was 7.6%. NAOI increased from 7.3% in 2013 to 8.0% in 2022 (p < 0.01). NAOI prevalence was highest in the most preterm infants. Compared to no NAOI, RRs (95% CI) for mortality were 8.5 (7.6-9.5) with 1, 118.1 (108.4-128.4) with 3, and 395.3 (367.2-425.0) with ≥5 NAOI components. Respective RRs for NICU admission were 6.7 (6.6-6.7), 11.2 (10.9-11.3), and 11.9 (11.6-12.2), and RR for extended hospital stay were 6.6 (6.4-6.7), 12.2 (11.7-12.7), and 26.4 (25.2-27.5). International comparison suggested that Canada had a higher prevalence of NAOI.

Conclusion: The Canadian NAOI captures neonatal morbidity using hospitalization data and is associated with neonatal mortality, NICU admission, and extended hospital stay. Newborn morbidity may be on the rise in recent years.

Keywords: Adverse events; Infant; Neonatal morbidity; Neonatal mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Temporal trend in the neonatal adverse outcome indicator (NAOI) among Canadian infants born at 24–42 weeks’ gestation. Data are for all of Canada (excluding Quebec), 2013–2022. NAOI, neonatal adverse outcome indicator; CIs, confidence intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Edstedt Bonamy AK, Zeitlin J, Piedvache A, Maier RF, van Heijst A, Varendi H, et al. . Wide variation in severe neonatal morbidity among very preterm infants in European regions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;104(1):F36–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heaman M, Kingston D, Helewa M, Derksen S, Bogdanovic B, McGowan B. Perinatal services and outcomes in Manitoba. 2012.
    1. Lebreton E, Menguy C, Fresson J, Egorova NN, Crenn Hebert C, Zeitlin J. Measuring severe neonatal morbidity using hospital discharge data in France. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022;36(2):190–201. - PubMed
    1. Lain SJ, Algert CS, Nassar N, Bowen JR, Roberts CL. Incidence of severe adverse neonatal outcomes: use of a composite indicator in a population cohort. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(3):600–8. - PubMed
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada . Perinatal health indicators report. 2008.